dewey_mcbrewster

joined 1 year ago
[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I would suspect entropy. Second Law of Thermodynamics states that total disorder is always increasing over time.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My post is supposed to illustrate some baseline. I used just an off-the-cuff, arbitrary yet heuristic figure from my experience working in, of all things, elderly care. I was a nurses aide and certified as a one-on-one for Alzheimer’s and dementia patients, helping the nurses feed and bathe, keeping the patients occupied…. Walking walking walking… and not falling out of bed etc.

I did this for 5 years.

So if you are running a business, and you have nurse employees, there are expenses, overhead, risks, and profit to take for your efforts. What should that number be? I picked 20% in the hopes someone would give perhaps a more realistic figure. Instead I get cut down.

And no, Im not copy and pasting anything.

What strikes me is, who can pay 3000 a month to watch granny? and that was just nurse salary, not meds, housing, etc. My numbers are made up, I chose 22 per hour for nurse pay, I have no idea what it really is, just wanted to get to get something going and im looking for others to post more data, though the conclusion will probably be the same… its a no win situation unless you’re extremely wealthy, granny dies.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I was thinking more like 20 percent markup as a profit margin. Other fees not included yet

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I’ve read Wrangham, Haw, Girard, Fields and others, but for the sake of brevity I chose one of many facets.

The author states that modern life is stressful and not normal. Personally i rather walk into an air-conditioned market than worry if my arrow hits home after sweating in ambush all day just to eat.

I think it was more normal to work hard, experience competition, and feel stresses of survival for most of human kinds existence, and that only now in the last few hundred years have we had it truly easy, even with poor agricultural returns.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

And did you tap latex trees for the rubber? Did you smelt ore for the metal? Did you buy the glass from a company that was used to can those vegetables or did you refine it yourself?

No. The seeds came from a catalog. The hatchet to chop the wood from a store.

Modern conveyance made it so you wouldn’t have to spend all day tending to survival. Yet the author seems to imply that life is harder now, than in the past.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (23 children)

I beg to differ.

An anthropologist should know about food scarcity. For thousands of years the family unit, tribe or village was under extreme competition from neighboring people and animals for resources.

There is a video from cameras on monkeys. They literally spend their whole day looking for food. Or in other words, every waking hour is spent in the pursuit of sustenance. Pre-tractor man was the same. Without modern capitalist agriculture you would be toiling on the farm tending to sheep, chickens, plowing fields, milking cows and all the myriad of tasks needed to fulfill the food groups you so nonchalantly stuff your face with. It be non-stop work for all the variety you currently take for granted.

The world, with low life-expectancies, was hazardous with no medicines, protections from the weather or modern law. Which i think brings a bit of stress when a festering carbuncle could mean your death. But thanks to innovation, it can now be easily cured by companies who seek monetary reward. I’ll take this normal over the other one.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I want a BYD very badly. A lot of people to blame here, Government for propping up a subpar product, unions for going too far with demands, aging and complacent workforce, lack of reinvestment, executive greed, piss poor repair record... Damn I want one of the Chinese EV's. Let free market be free.

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At some point AI will infer beyond the wildest dreams. The mere description of an object will be enough to infer any combination.

Through that inference, just knowing what a woman or a child looks like will be enough to put an image of child in any situation without any pre training images.

What’s ironic is, you’ll actually have to upload and train on CSAM to catch these inferences.

Do we ban hammers because a few people used them in the wrong way?

[–] dewey_mcbrewster@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Prices will most likely be set by the classic calculus optimization problems. Therefore, it will be imperative to “not purchase” until value is commensurate to utility. Easier said than done of course.

view more: next ›