cschreib

joined 2 years ago
[–] cschreib@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Confusing read. Also using "moms" as a shortcut to imply "non tech savvy people" is not a great choice. Way to antagonize and diminish women for the sake of a punchline.

[–] cschreib@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

To me it's less about the aesthetics and more about ergonomics. I still feel at times that the UI, specifically the toolbar, is jumbled together without much cohesion. Or that the interface has been designed to allow entering inputs to someone else's tool, rather than built for me to do what I need.

I'm sure some of it can probably be customized; I don't actually use it that much that I feel the need to tinker.

[–] cschreib@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] cschreib@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Have not used it for programming.

At work, this is to some extent because we haven't decided yet whether to trust sending away our codebase to be potentially trained on.

In general, this is because I find the agressive FOMO-inducing marketting revolting, and because it would be increasing our dependence on big tech companies where I believe we should do just the opposite.

I did use it once or twice to get pointers on topics I wasn't familiar with (e.g., new standards or protocols, ...), mostly just to get a helicopter view and some sources to follow it up when i was in a rush at work. Would not do that on my personal time.

I wouldn't object to using an open-source/open-training, ethically trained, self hosted model.

[–] cschreib@programming.dev 24 points 2 months ago

The vast majority of users don't need "more meat" in their OS. They need stability. Linux Mint works great on that front, I don't see the need to loose focus with multiple new distros. Not everyone needs to jump distro every month.

Disclaimer: i've been using Linux Mint for over 10 years without ever hopping to something else. And I'm a software engineer, not a casual user.

[–] cschreib@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

As much as I dislike AI, programming is a field where there's always something for someone to hate. E.g., should we ban C++ articles because there's a lot of Rust fans that hate them?

Your two options are not exclusive. Just create a community to discuss AI programming, cross post to the generic programming community if you think it's relevant, and let people upvote/downvote as they see fit.

[–] cschreib@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

This may be KDE Connect. I noticed this happening between my desktop and my phone when installing that app (non KDE desktop). A bit scary at first.

 

curl https://some-url/ | sh

I see this all over the place nowadays, even in communities that, I would think, should be security conscious. How is that safe? What's stopping the downloaded script from wiping my home directory? If you use this, how can you feel comfortable?

I understand that we have the same problems with the installed application, even if it was downloaded and installed manually. But I feel the bar for making a mistake in a shell script is much lower than in whatever language the main application is written. Don't we have something better than "sh" for this? Something with less power to do harm?