Adding on to what the other commenter mentioned, that is called a breaking change and would generally be avoided at all costs by libssl. See, e.g., the decades-long python3 transition.
crestwave
joined 2 years ago
You cannot fork the current project because it is not open source anymore. A fork of the last available GPL release would be possible, though.
Just because it’s open source
It's not open source. The maintainer relicensed the project from GPL to the current source-available license last year.
The AUR package uses the last GPL release before the change and thus does the current license does not apply.
That is true, but bathing after avoiding it for 60 years is still a significant change in environment that probably isn't great if you're 94 years old.
SO did go overboard at times; I've seen quite a few instances where posts were locked for being "duplicates" of completely unrelated problems. Oftentimes they were accompanied with unnecessarily rude messages as well.
But yes, the unwillingness of some (most?) people to use the search function baffles me. They'd prefer to write a narrative essay in SO for their FizzBuzz assignment and argue with mods rather than type a few keywords to instantly get the solution.
PvE Deadlock already exists—it's called Risk of Rain 2.
The two games actually have a decently similar feel and it's no surprise that Valve eventually hired some of the RoR2 devs.
I find that "no AI" DDG still has way more AI-generated images than default Google, sadly. And there's no
before:operator as an alternative to filter them out, either.