blitzen

joined 3 years ago
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

It might be the primary and only responsibility of being human.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ya, he mentioned the “identifiable” thing in the video. I’m not really how much truth is in that. Even if true, I feel better about being logged as “unidentifiable [color] [make] [model] with bike rack,” over [license plate number] which can be used to look up my name and address.

Even if his license plate trick worked under his conditions, there’s no way of knowing if it’s tricking Flock cameras or if it is, if it confines to do so with updates. And you never know if it fails, you’ll continue to think it’s working while it’s not.

Neither way is perfect, so perhaps the better solution it to assume your vehicle is always tracked and to take alternate forms of transportation when engaging in something you don’t want logged.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

There’s YouTube video out there, the name escapes at the moment, where he figures out how to basically insert “noise” over his license plate that can lead to flock cameras not recognizing it. Fascinating stuff.

Two big issues IMO. 1) maybe it fools cameras now, but who knows if it continues to. 2) it’s illegal to cover your plate, probably doubly with the intent to obfuscate. My solution is bike rack. “Oops, didn’t meant to cover my plate” is good plausible deniability.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 142 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Patent trolls are some of the only companies that make Disney actually the good guy for a change.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

“Memories, fading memories, blending into dull tableaux.”

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is there a resource to find out who has contracts with Flock?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 68 points 4 months ago (11 children)

I used deflock to look for cameras around me; I CANNOT leave my city limits by car without passing by a Flock camera.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 months ago

He’ll just “sell” tax exempt status for 50% of what can be saved when exempt.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

There is logic behind not prohibiting people from fleeing from a legitimate threat.

But if his comments don’t also include the statement that people protests blocking traffic don’t constitute a threat, it’s just implicit permission to harm protesters.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 101 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Walkable” to a gas station is a strong indication of satire.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That is pretty cool. But I have to think since the US is the country in which this is pertinent an iOS app would be most effective.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I legitimately have an idea for an app that solves this problem. Its key feature, besides being open source, would be that people without uteruses could use it too, making any data conceivably collected useless.

I don’t have the skills to make it myself (yet), but if any developer wants to talk I’ll give the idea away. I just want it to be made.

App would be open source, all data local. Perhaps the option to sync to encrypted iCloud or Android equivalent, but certainly not a cloud-based option you need a new login for. All the features currently in these kinds of apps and that make them useful for menstruating people. Now replace “period” with “hair cut”. Non-menstruating people can now use it, earnestly, for tracking when their last hair cut was, making it useful and the data (if it were to be collected somehow) just noise.

I even have a name in mind: “hair**.**cuts” (heavy emphasis on the period in the name.) Idea is that anyone with it on their device has plausible deniability that they are using it for period tracking, but the “period” in the name is an implicit wink so we all know what it’s really being used for.

view more: next ›