bleustenns

joined 5 months ago
 

Title. I'm broke, live at home, and can't work (disabled). I figured asking this here would help other broke people. I'm in the US.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's a way to not copy+paste? How?

 

My apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this.

I've been reading around online about keeping software secure, and I've been puzzled by something for a while now. I'm not sure if this is a stupid question or not.

Generally, when I see online conversation about Linux vulnerabilities, I often see people detailing the how big the attack surface of the Linux kernel itself is due to its' monolithic kernel; I saw a blog post about this very thing linked somewhere here on Lemmy recently. I also see folks glamoring about how the BSD 'spinoffs' (?) all have much better fundamental approaches to security, and they get compared to Linux quite often as 'the superior platform' due to things like the non-monolithic kernel and BSD Jails. Hell, one of the main self-touted benefits of the BSDs is that there is significant effort placed on discovering vulnerabilities.

Could someone knowledgeable tell me why desktop Linux has seemed to be 'chosen' in comparison to something like FreeBSD or OpenBSD? I don't see any open-source forks of a BSD spinoff (only proprietary ones like what runs on the PS5), nor do I see anyone talking about using them for desktop computing purposes. Is there a fundamental challenge too great to overcome right now with using something like FreeBSD as a desktop OS, or has there simply not been enough volunteer manpower to throw at it, and Linux already has that problem, in comparison, solved? It shocks me that the adoption is so low, especially considering the reportedly amazing binary compatibility with most existing Linux software.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you, this is a really helpful answer and string of replies. I do not work in computer science, nor do I have any prerequisite knowledge on how security on Linux is typically handled, but this got me a little closer to understanding things and I appreciate it.

Sorta kinda not really related- I appreciated your less-than-topical section a lot, maybe for slightly different reasons than assumed. As someone trying to learn how to tinker with computers and self-host services 'the right way', I have been trying to comb through a lot of information written by folks with years and years of experience. I can't tell you how many times I've felt like the weirdo when I am told to 'just do X', so I try to 'just do X', and I'm expected to have a job doing this stuff to understand what 'X' even is and how it works.

It's a massive turn-off from learning anything, especially when those knowledgeable people suggest only the most jargon-laden explanations and pointers, and then shut down others who suggest forgoing their methods altogether. Maybe my problems arise from appending 'reddit' onto most of my searches, but that's about the only place I know I can see (what looks like) actual people interacting, and more specifically, people asking newbie questions. Stack overflow is hell to find good answers with, I find...

I posted this both because I feel like Lemmy benefits from people posting engaging questions like this in its' current state, and mainly because I couldn't get a straight answer out of anyone when I was wondering why people were trashing on SELinux so often. I want to do things the right way! I deeply value security and doing things 'correctly', but I've not the experience, knowledge, or time required to do things 'the right way' as it exists in others' eyes. I'm not you, dude! I just want to learn how to host Jellyfin in my bedroom; it's hurricane season and I need YouTube videos to play while I do things, and I'm aware anything to do with networking should be handled carefully. I don't care about stuff like leaving SELinux enabled, because I don't understand why I should. Help me care instead of being a dick and/or unaware of how much you actually know and can do yourself.

Arrrgh. Hopefully that was coherent. (Also, if I get told to use an LLM again, I'll lose my mind! I'm learning, I don't need the hallucinating plagiarism machine as a teacher!)

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I see, thank you for explaining. Personally, I will stick with alternatives as I've a moral obligation to LLM usage for things like this, although it sucks to say that as the 'selling features' of this app are really enticing to me. Hope things work out.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Was AI used in the process of making this app, and if so, how? I have personal issues with using 'vibe-coded' software. This looks very, very nice, so I figured I'd ask.

 

Title.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Big Mac? Like the My Little Pony dude?

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean by, "...a lot of the things you don't know yet will get you into big trouble..."?

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Call your reps guys, tell them you want them to vote yes on this! Don't wait for someone else to do it either, write it down or something!!!

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 weeks ago

They've been conned, and it's not their fault. It is up to the people who see things objectively to kindly guide their attention towards the class war, 's the only way to win it.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Could you fill me in on those decisions you mentioned from Startpage? I've been trusting it for a while now but don't really keep up with a whole lot of things.

[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] bleustenns@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

i think many rational americans are excited for the development of science in general that comes with space exploration endeavors. it doesnt all have to be doom and gloom, although i do agree the US as an empire definitely had reasons along the lines of, "hey look at how big our dick is we went to space"

view more: next ›