bagodogs

Debatable. They're fucking over paying customers either way, but if it were added post release, the DRM-free version would remain.

The article doesn't have anything to do with race, but thank you for the racism.

Det er slet ikke et argument jeg har givet; det er ikke en debat jeg er interesseret i at have. Jeg siger, at sandsynligheden for militært indgreb stiger når der er, hos den generelle offentlighed, moralsk grundlag.

Det gav moralsk grundlag for militært indgreb, og øgede derved chancen.

Ikke overraskende efter Iran lukkede for internetadgang og slagtede demonstranter.

I would definitely buy this. At half the price and without the Battle.net requirement.

Jeg er ikke globalist, så jeg set det som et negativ præcis fordi det er mere end en handelsaftale. Det lugter for mig meget af import af arbejdskraft, i stedet for at arbejde for forhold der giver et land bedre muligheder for at opbygge egen arbejdsstyrke.

Worth noting that this is from a GDC survey.

Det omtalte signal: "light 'em up, Donnie."

Taking a 30 percent cut seems to be standard for the industry, and Valve provides above-standard services such as Workshop, matching, cloud sync, various community integrations. That aside, if they took a smaller cut, none of this would be passed on to the customer. In summary, whichever way the suit goes, I don't see a reason to care.

You may be thinking of the UK petition.

No, I mean the error pops up as soon as the launcher opens, not when you try to login through Steam. My point is that it detects that you're running the client through Steam, so it's even more likely that A Steam release isn't far off.