arty

joined 2 years ago
 

… or is it Erica carnea?

[–] arty@feddit.org -1 points 3 weeks ago

Would you also say that we have absolutely no way to confirm that Facebook managers know how addictive their apps are for children? I’m pretty sure that just a few years ago cynical people would say that. But only a couple of days ago this was proved in the court and Facebook lost the case.

So yeah, I believe that taking the company’s word for it is generally a winning strategy, and that blatant violations are relatively rare. Here, MS has a lot to lose and not much to win.

[–] arty@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

To mirror your question: do you really believe that a significant fraction of users will uncheck this checkbox?

Personally, I think only a few percent will do this and Microsoft does not care about losing their data.

[–] arty@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't say it is quite simple to do such a quality replacement in Photoshop. I'd argue that people with necessary skill level are rather rare.

[–] arty@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The face is wrong

 

Can't resist posting two more pics A bumblebee aims for a pink almond blossom A bee feasts on a pink almond blossom

[–] arty@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just wanted to say that at a volume of an Olympic swimming pool of 2500 m³, and a density of plutonium of 19.85 g/cm³, a pool can contain about ridiculous 50,000 tons of plutonium

[–] arty@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You guys are having own hostname in hosts file?

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

the ecosystem seems to have died about 2 years

Yeah, as I said elsewhere, less alive than before

it requires signing up to join the system

I think the point of the standard was that you don’t have to sign up with someone specific.

But in more general terms, of course one has to sign up with some bank or website or wallet that will receive the money or send the money.

[–] arty@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AFAIK it was already working, though cumbersome to set up. Then a core enable stopped supporting it, and now it is less alive than before. However I’m not deep into the topic and the last info I got from this article.

[–] arty@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

There are efforts on a standard called Web Monetization

[–] arty@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Bayern verteidigt Habeck-Gesetz" auch nicht?

[–] arty@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

Framework allows replacing and upgrading screens as the core feature. But for Chad ThinkPad this is a great achievement: "Even the screen is upgradeable with some tricks".

[–] arty@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

Ich habe zuerst über 25% Verlust gelesen

27
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by arty@feddit.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

So a new major version of Debian has been released, and now I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version. I don't want to rush to conclusions like "Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance". I can easily come up with explanations for why these statistics can be skewed, like "Ubuntu-loving plebeians do not come to complain to elite Lemmy users about their puny problems". I'm curious what you think?

 
view more: next ›