aamram

joined 2 years ago
[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

you don't have to be smart to work there. In fact it's better to be dumb so that common people could relate.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I mean... this goes for democrats as well. I don't see them doing anything to change the situation.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

how dare you communist! /s

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

This. Exactly this is the main problem in the US

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

AfD in Germany

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

lol... I feel fking old now...

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

I don't need luck if I have vaccines.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At this point I guess we're just assuming it's "buggy" due to the IA, right? You guys just have to accept that these tools will do better job than humans in the near future, at least for basic or intermediate programming. It's going to get better that it is today and we're going to have to live with it. I agree on marking the code. That should be necessary. Besides that, I really don't care about the dev. As I said before no one is forcing us to use Lutris.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I actually dont see the fucking problem. Let them develop it way they want. People will tell if it's good or not.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Every software application Is a commercial product itself. The more appealing, the more users and thus relevance...

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because aesthethics also change through the years. You have to make your product appealing to today's standards.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

It's not just the US though... the rest of the world is following the same path. You're just winning by a good margin.

view more: next ›