_j_

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] _j_@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

well yes, as I said I've used browser extensions for dedicated managers before, and I'm aware of KeePass. But my question is more about whether that's better somehow than firefox. i.e. more secure/convenient/etc. I ask because in my armchair experience the built-in one is completely fine and idk what the advantage of a dedicated manager is over the built-in one.

 

I store all of my passwords in firefox's built-in password manager. They auto-fill into websites, sync to my phone, notify me if one appears publicly, and I can generate strong new passwords conveniently. The pw vault is stored encrypted in the cloud as far as I know, but I don't really know the technical details. I presume that it's just as secure as using a "proper" manager.

Is there a problem with not using a dedicated password manager? I used to use LastPass but then.. I stopped. And at the time I didn't see anything wrong with just sticking with FF.

Using Firefox is fine right? If so, what's the benefit of something like BitWarden/etc over the built-in one?

 

It must surely be imminent. He's not in the best health if the reports about him eating mcdonalds all the time are true. He's 79 which isn't that old but I dont see many fat, stressed 90 year olds on a mcdonalds diet.

Say he had a heart attack next week.. then what? Presumably Vance would take over as actual president, but I can't imagine anyone being as bad as him. Would the maga movement continue with a different cult leader? Do you think things would meaningfully change?

[โ€“] _j_@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago

ooh, me, pick me, sacrifice me pls