Zabjam

Or maybe do like Putin / Xi do-- agree respectfully, then do whatever you were going to do, anyway.

And when called out, bold faced lie about and blame the accuser for spreading lies about you

You know, standard Russian foreign politics.

Windows went from 8 to 10. Why can't he go from 3 to 5?

Yeah - the question is how long this will continue. They have already learned that they will keep losing on that front if they do not start looking more appealing. The tone in social media has changed and they are advertising with local issues and what not.

They are still the same shitstain Nazis underneath this "we care about our community" paint job. But they see their problem in local governments and are trying to solve it. I worry that it will not be too long until they start to be successful in local elections

Adolfs faschistische Drecksbande

Ganz schön arg. Habe eine bessere Idee. Ich will sie als Mieterin bei Vonovia sehen mit drei Mindestlohnjobs in denen ihre Chefs sie ums Gehalt prellen. Ich will sie in der Lebenssituation sehen in der so viele sind, die sie und Merz verachten

Had to Google, the highest number in Germany is apparently 1501 in a street in Cologn. But yes, you are right, streets are usually not long enough to reach such high numbers.

"we have to be lucky only once, you have to be lucky always"

Ich verstehe deinen Punkt und teile deine Meinung, dass die Haltung gegen Waffenlieferungen ein dickes Minus für Die Linke ist. Ich denke aber auch, dass wir in Deutschland ein großes Problem bekommen werden, wenn Menschen mit linken Werten nicht anfangen "Kräfte" zu bündeln. Ich habe selbst oft Parteien gewählt die die 5% nicht geschafft haben, weil die mehr mit meinen Ansichten überein stimmten als eine Partei die die 5% erreicht. Das Problem ist, Rechte tun das nicht. Vielen ist es egal ob sie da den Teufel in Person wählen solange er Ihnen verspricht, dass er Ausländer abschiebt.

Ich teile deine Ansicht, aber ich weiss nicht wie man das Problem anders lösen kann als Kompromisse zu wählen.

No it is not. That's only an answer if one thinks that every sources bias is as bad as any other, which was rejected earlier as "outrages strawman". Under the assumption that sources can be more or less biased, it is worth questioning the bias and the statement "there's no such thing as a source with no bias" is a moot point.

Sure buddy. It is still irrelevant. It is not hypocritical to ciritice a source. You don't have to prove a different point to bring forward criticism. The only question should be "is the criticism valid?" And not "do you have a better point?"

But there is a spectrum. Or are you telling me that every source is as biased as any other?