Where is the evidence? All we have is claims.
SnoopSqueak
joined 3 weeks ago
How do you know? Everything you've shown so far is natural phenomena and humans making shit up.
Why do you pretend there is a god?
People are dying for your mistakes.
We pay in sabertooth tigers for sabertooth tigers, and hey, your sabertooth tiger boss would like to show you a sabertooth tiger, just scroll down on your mobile sabertooth tiger, skip a few sabertooth tigers, click the tiger, and then you should see a sabertooth tiger.
And do not sleep. There are tigers.
Another polish article about this: https://naukawpolsce.pl/aktualnosci/news%2C367624%2Cuniwersytet-medyczny-odcina-sie-od-badan-ws-cudu-w-sokolce.html
The Medical University of Białystok officially distances itself from the results of these studies and emphasizes that the university does not endorse them.
One of the most valuable things about science is the consistent ability for anyone to repeat the experiment and get the same result. Why does the catholic church keep hiding from showing us that it is true?
"We did not do this as a university," Chyczewski told PAP, adding that the tests were conducted illegally, "quietly," outside the official channels. They took place at the Academic Department of Pathomorphological Diagnostics. Chyczewski emphasizes that the university was not commissioned to perform these tests, and the study was not registered anywhere. "Please do not attribute the diagnosis to any specific department operating within the institution called the Medical University," Chyczewski wrote in his statement.
Why didn't they collaborate with the university, if they have legitimate evidence?
Professor Chyczewski believes that his colleagues who made the diagnosis made a "schoolboy error" by trying to combine theology and biology, which, in his opinion, is impossible.
Because biology is evident and theology is not.
Just a few weeks ago, when the news of the tests became public, Archbishop Ozorowski said: "We are dealing with an extremely subtle matter. If we confess that this is the body of Christ, we cannot just cut it into pieces and subject it to tests. We must exercise caution and a certain fear."
Fear of your own savior? Fear of your "loving" god's punishment for proving his own existence? This same god who once loved when his own creations were eviscerated and cooked now is squeamish? Ohhhh, no, I get it, he's only offended when it's his OWN flesh that gets... Wait, what about Jesus, though? He was willing to make that sacrifice, but not this one?
Please stop defending catholicism. It is a death cult. People are dying for your false beliefs.
But without detailed reports? You just take them at their word?
You believe god is all-powerful, yes? And you believe this is how he chooses to interact with us?
Why would I do that when it's not my claim? The onus is on you to show that they were disallowed.
If you can disprove the contents of the article you chose to criticize, please do.
I know what the article and the headline say. Your initial criticism is still invalid.
Can you find a source that says they were allowed to resubmit the post?
I do not have a facebook account to see the group page for myself. According to the article, the criticism was not reposted. It was banned there, as reflected by the headline.
They asked about submitting the post for approval
...which was ignored. Instead:
they were offered a meeting with Acton.
...which turned out to be a lie.
Where do you get the idea that they were allowed to resubmit the post?
the Ohio Democratic Party had demanded the criticism be removed. The caucus protested, appealed, but then relented. The criticism never went back up.
It was banned.
No. Remember? They tried that:
After deleting the original statement, we promptly asked about submitting the post for approval through the proper channels so that it could be reposted. At this point, ODP staff informed us that a meeting with Acton was on the table. After thorough discussion, caucus leadership determined this offer aligned with our goal to bring our message directly to her.
They got tricked into attending a meeting without Acton. And some of them weren't allowed into the meeting.
That isn't the question. The question is "why can't the original posters resubmit through the proper channels"? Because it was banned.
view more: next ›
I recently started treatment for my alcohol dependency; imo, no one should drink it. Alcohol is basically poison. It is worse the younger you start:
https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/niaaa-middle-school/too-soon-too-dangerous