ReasonableHat

joined 2 years ago
[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Fair enough; not my intention with the wording - I'm also generally in favour.

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thank you for the response! I'm not sure of the reason for the negative reaction to the question, but I was curious to see whether time had shifted opinion on non-EU arms manufacturers being allowed to benefit from the fund seeing as the prevailing sentiment some months ago seemed to be that it was a good thing that non-EU manufacturers were excluded.

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately not, but thanks for the recommendation on cloths!

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Genuine question: do the lines diverge (and in which direction / how much) if you account for the number of cars / guns per person?

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some great updates that I was not aware of - more for the wishlist with ever-decreasing time to play! Thank you!

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Looks beautiful. Not played one of these for years.

[–] ReasonableHat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

This is utter madness in relation to the UK if the EU keeps insisting on including other crap (e.g. fishing rights) in any third country defence agreement. The UK is as much a part of Europe and has as much of an interest in its defence as Norway and Ukraine, for example.