PeriodicallyPedantic

joined 2 years ago
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The reply I made doesn't depend on the definition of imperialism because the comment I was replying to wasn't refuting that definition of imperialism.

I was pointing out that their argument boiled down to "yeah well that doesn't count because the USA does it too".

Idk why you're trying so hard to be an asshole, but you're putting words in my mouth and then insulting me about them.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For sure split up the USA.

Maybe then they'll be too occupied to meddle with other nations

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hold up.

I think that mobile phones became popular before chat rooms.
Chat rooms existed first, but I think that they were mostly just for nerds until the early to mid 2000s

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You sound like an asshole, fyi

You can pry my lol from my cold dead fingers lol

As I've said repeatedly what China is doing is better than what the USA is doing. But that's bar is so low that it's buried under the ground. Being better than the USA doesn't make them beyond criticism and doesn't make it good. The lesser of evils is still evil.

I'm aware.
But practically, that's a difference without distinction. The majority of the rest of the world considers Taiwan to be a sovereign nation, and Taiwan has been acting as such for a long time. Functionally, that argument is the same as Russia is making with Ukraine, and technicalities over academic language doesn't change that.

North Korea and South Korea are de facto separate countries, even though their civil war technically didn't end. If the south invaded the North, that'd be the same.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The potential for bad is bad. It's why benevolent dictatorship is still bad.

Let's not forget the long history of vassal state politicians praising and thanking their subjugator.

Again, I think this is better than what the USA does, but it's still worthy of criticism.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Do better at what? This isn't a competition.

The dude said "yeah well the USA does it too", as though doing the same thing as an imperialist nation was some kind of gotcha.
That's the conversation.

So what is the point y'all are making with your memelording?

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -2 points 6 days ago (5 children)

China and laos have strong friendship... According to China today? 🤨

I'm not saying that China is currently taking advantage of Laos, I'm saying that China has put Laos in a position where nothing is stopping them from taking advantage of Laos. The threat is implicit.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -5 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Bro didn't read the thread, I can tell

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"active civil war"

LOL stay on your meds, kids

 

I have my pangolin server set up and working, providing forward auth and roll based access before reverse proxying my self hosted resources.

However when I have the pangolin zero-trust client connected, I want to skip the forward auth since I'm already authed via the client. I want to do this since some apps like Jellyfin don't play nice with the forward auth.

I can't find a way to achieve this - there is no rule for connected clients. When I set up as a private resource, then I don't get the reverse-proxy functionality, so when the client is connected my urls change (need to add ports), which isn't really acceptable.

I can set up another reverse proxy behind pangolin, but pangolin already provides reverse proxying so that seems silly.

What am I missing? How can I achieve the goal of skipping forward auth when the pangolin client is connected?

 

The day should start at like... Equatorial dawn or something.

 

All of the major review websites for gaming hardware conspicuously did not include the smaller handheld OEMs in their head-to-head rankings/comparisons. Unfortunate it is only these smaller OEMs that support external GPUs.

I know that a bunch of ayaneo and onexplayer devices can run bazzite, can you folks recommend any (relatively ) unbiased reviews sites that can provide head-to-head comparisons that include the major OEMs and the smaller OEMs too?
I've been out of touch with the PC review scene for a while now and idk who is trustworthy and would still bother with the smaller brands.

I'm looking to pick up a new bazzite handheld that I can dock to an eGPU.

 

Looking at buying a handheld PC, and none of the review sites cover OEMs like ayaneo or onexplayer in their head-to-hear breakdowns, so I can't get an idea how those ones compare to the major OEMs.
It's frustrating because those small OEMs are the only ones that support eGPUs
But it's only mildly frustrating because honestly I know my usecase is a bit of an edge case.

82
hmmm (lemmy.ca)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca to c/hmmm@lemmy.world
 
 

What about being around 10000 bananas for 8 hours? Are people on banana plantations at significantly higher risk of cancer?

Come mista tally man
Tally me tumours
Daylight come and me need to go hospital 😔

 

I may have been packing lunches instead of showering, when I thought of this.

 

Back when optical disks were more common mediums for video games

 

She is so proud of me, she tells everyone

 

I cum in the shower, instead.

 

Imagine living in a universe where, without even trying, you can run so fast that if you trip, you will die and splatter your body over a couple hundred meters of ground. And if you trip into someone, it'll kill them and possibly an entire pile of people.

Like, in motor racing, the cars get wrecked but the drivers are fine. In the movie Cars, they all die. The race spectators are watching a blood sport.

view more: next ›