The Economist is 
Also quite brazen though
The Economist is 
Also quite brazen though
No, it isn’t a dog whistle. It’s clear-as-day use of hateful language.
Pogroms are also bad, but that’s irrelevant to this conversation. We’re not talking about Pinochet or Pol Pot either. What you are doing is defending the term “PC master race”. Notice how nobody here is able to create a positive argument for why the casual use of such clearly hateful language is ok. Perhaps you should recognize that there isn’t one.
You’re here and he’s not.
Why are you rushing to defend the term “master race”? You don’t need to do this.
No excuses.
Maybe think for a bit about whether you really want to defend your use of that term or not.
I think the last time any PlayStation game was re-released at a discount with the hits/platinum/best branding was back in the 2010s. They don’t seem to do this anymore either.
I have to wonder why hydro is always left out of the solar+wind clean energy statistics. Is it just because it’s old tech?
It’s quite difficult and/or very expensive to collect that data since these platforms deleted their open APIs. As far as most researchers are concerned this information is now basically unknowable.
Further proof that orcs are actually the smartest, as they are the only ones not falling for 1000+ hour obsession games.
I support the airport-style security & surveillance of commuters on the Shanghai metro, but that’s because when America decides you are its enemy you need to be extra fucking careful.