NullHawk

joined 1 year ago
[–] NullHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

This read to me that the intent is to be better able to track and measure and control employees productivity on the job. And this could also be sold to other employers.

[–] NullHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Yes, but we nonetheless do have privacy services in Canada, like 1password and Hushmail. Having weaker privacy laws will make these companies even less competitive.

Yet it is a German company that is raising attention on bill c-2 instead of Canadian companies.

[–] NullHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It adds to Tuta's trust and reputation when they are speaking out against bill C-2.

However, this made me realize something though. Why haven't I heard much from Canadian based "privacy" services?

[–] NullHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

??? It’s “useless” if you use other privacy-focused tools in your browser or internet connection?

The phrasing is weird. I guess the more privacy-focused tools you have, the more features in Leta becomes redundant.

For most people Leta can be useful, as the above conditions cannot ever truly be met by systems that are available today.

But I guess this line implies using Leta will guarantee completeness? I guess this implies it is difficult to completely block all possible tracking technologies on our own with the tools and systems we have available to us.

[–] NullHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure Spotify was excluded for a reason