Majestic

joined 2 years ago
[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is also why America’s future may look less like collapse and more like controlled decline combined with harder nationalism, stronger surveillance, weaker labor power, and more political anger directed sideways instead of upward.

I have to agree. Many imagine a big dramatic implosion where the US just loses power and kind of collapses in a heap arguing with itself which isn't likely to happen. The imperial boomerang is already coming home with heightened repression, police state, surveillance. Think of the children bills, VPN bans coming in not just the US but the EU (it's vassal) so there is nowhere in the western world to run and the rest of the world can just be blocked or you can be black-bagged in the night for being a commie for using a non-western VPN (none such that are no-logs and unlimited* exist that I'm aware of funnily enough).

*I exclude criminal network VPNs that require high costs and are for cybercrime use and would be impractical for your average torrent user or privacy seeker to use.

But the empire will endure, transform, repress at home to keep the line going up and lash out as much as it can externally at free African states, Latin America, Asia, etc. And it will be strong enough even if this is part of a final decline to keep doing this and repressing at home for decades IMO. Of course Lenin himself thought he'd never live to see the revolution so things could always change but the current structure of problems for the US barring new developments doesn't seem to lend itself to anything that dramatic, just the US putting on a new outfit and tightening the chains on the domestic proles.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It was allies who had dolphins in Red Alert 2. Soviets had giant squids as a comparable sea asset.

Soviets got giant squids, subs (because sneaky commies), flak ships, and missile cruisers. Meanwhile allies got dolphins (which could easily take down squids in a group), destroyers (sub hunting, could see subs and launch helicopter/plane), aegis cruisers (anti-missile defense), and aircraft carriers. Both sides also got hovercraft.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes. Marxists have a distinction between personal property (your toothbrush, your desk and pens) and private property (a factory or an auto dealership full of cars or a supermarket).

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't matter.

The only reason to have VPNs for this is preventing internet shut-offs, fines, and nasty letters. Those only exist in the first world for the most part and only parts of it (in Germany they will directly fine you thousands per violation most severe case, in most places like the US they just shut off your internet after enough violations but you get warnings).

If your country doesn't have a regime for fining you directly for this, doesn't have internet shut-off laws, and doesn't have any other major consequences then it doesn't matter. You can look it up.

Even some first world countries don't care. Through a quirk of law in Australia for example it's basically impossible for copyright holders to go after people doing p2p stuff for anything but the retail price ($20) of works so it's not worth their time and people there can do it freely.

No one else in the swarm cares who you are nor can they do anything. Use a modern client like Qbittorrent and keep it updated to stay secure.

At most maybe your ISP may throttle your bittorrent traffic because it's not hidden using a VPN. But if you don't have money you're not getting a VPN that would improve your speed situation anyways. Just be patient.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Then they will break you and industry that wants data will win. You vs bourgeois governments, you will lose.

This is a serious push and though children are the cover they're after surveillance. Take away their talking points, give them what they claim to want but in a privacy-preserving way and this goes away for another 10 years before they can make another push.

If we win this fight by doing a zero knowledge form they have no scaffolding to use on which to build anything further. If we lose and they build something that isn't zero knowledge it will 100% be used in a few years to iterate on to build more surveillance and control.

Basically if we don't push for this privacy alternative and instead fight like hell against it entirely they'll listen to the only voices putting forward a solution which is meta and the other privacy invasive actors who want an invasive approach. If it's made heard that people will accept this we can shunt them onto this path.

Ideally we'd push onto this path but make demands that it doesn't require verification. That parents can set it up at phone/computer setup and it cannot be changed without reinstalling the OS or erasing the phone and that on phones it gets tied to a Google/Apple account. That way there's not even any identity aspect involved but tools given to parents who want to do this. Shove it back to parental responsibility. But this would be a compromise we could live with and still have some privacy with.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Except it notes that the wireguard dev definitely complied with that so while Microslop might be hiding behind that fiction it is just a fiction and not the real cause.

I'm suspicious if it isn't because the US has discovered something exploitable in both wireguard and veracrypt and want to prevent it being patched while they (the US) unleash it against their enemies over a prolonged period. That or just crushing privacy.

Linux stay winning I guess as this would be the first case in history where Microsoft has used its position as gatekeeper to prevent Windows users from running software they want to run in this manner. Even worse you have to disable driver signature enforcement system-wide to bypass it, it's more locked down than Apple which can grant per application gate-keeper exemptions. It's just up until now Microsoft handed out driver signing like candy.

It's interesting both of these are also tools likely be targeted by the "child safety" panic being shopped around to enact ID laws. Encryption without a backdoor is something they really hate whether it's for data in transit or at rest.

One last thought is that Microsoft mentioned kicking third parties out of the kernel after the Crowdstrike fiasco where they borked a ton of airline computers due to awful practices. Many hoped it would mean kicking anti-cheat out of the kernel but it would be very Microsoft to start with kicking privacy tools out instead and simply insist that using Windows bitlocker is enough and Windows VPN settings are adequate and therefore these software needn't be in the kernel.

 

This affects their ability to sign new device drivers on Windows if they want to create updated versions. Without signed device drivers the software will not work.

No explanation was given. Some think it may be a bug or AI tool that isn't working right. But the NSA really hates both of these tools.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

For proprietary streaming apps where I want to be able to see what's going on because I'm allowed a higher resolution than a 720p blurry mess? Apple's TVos seems pretty great. Zero ads, smooth, devices are overpowered for watching just TV. It does have apps for Jellyfin and Plex though I'd have to suggest infuse instead which is a $12 annual subscription for 4k or any proprietary audio codecs but it does work pretty well.

For everything else some version of libelec or corelec depending on the device in question it's being installed on. There are also external launchers that keep Android but remove most of the problems.

If you want plug and it works then AppleTV. If you're interested in putting in some work maybe a custom launcher on an android install. Beyond that libelec, coreleck, and Kodi.

Kodi maintains a big csv list of hardware (and software) with capabilities and suggestions here: https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=376035

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Dust, fingerprints, etc.

Allegedly they may check these things under black lights at the factory for any evidence of opening to attempt to deny warranty. With drive prices having doubled since I bought it and all capacity bought out they'd be extra eager to find any excuse to attempt to deny. Magnuson–Moss warranty act should prevent them from doing that but I don't have a high power law firm on retainer to sue and intimidate western digital into compliance if they tell me to pound dirt.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thanks for the kind offer.

Funnily enough I have a WD HDD enclosure that I shucked a drive from not too long ago. I do recall someone mentioning the circuit boards on those being functional as a USB to SATA bridge but I suppose I presumed they need mains power and didn't want the extra mess. That and I guess I wanted to keep the one I had pristine in case I need to RMA after putting it back together again as I've heard people have real mixed experience with RMAing shucked drives and with prices the way they are well I'd rather not take chances given I've only the one.

 

Title. I need a USB 3 to SATA adapter to use a spare 2.5" SSD with a machine that doesn't have any spare SATA ports and no place to put it at this point.

I've read that most of these adapters have issues with supporting TRIM on Linux. I need one that supports TRIM.

So any recommendations for something that will survive reboots which I'm planning to use for semi-permanent game storage?

An enclosure style is fine.

(Note: I too can search Amazon. When looking into the reviews from Linux users most of the adapters that claim to work with Linux have people clarifying TRIM doesn't work.)

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Do you have a link to that claim? The last time I saw a similar claim it said she said it on a radio program or something. So is there any documentation I can bookmark or is it just hearsay? Because while early ST (ToS, TNG especially) definitely had some vibes, I kind of been under the assumption lately that Roddenberry was an idealist who wasn't any more communist than some turn of last century bourgeoisie who imagined mass communal projects and a peaceful futurist transition to a kind of very regimented social democracy.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 68 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No thank you. I like Firefox the way it is. I hate big changes for the sake of designers keeping their jobs changing my tools and workflow and making things ugly.

view more: next ›