Jrockwar

joined 2 years ago
[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like Gmail? Google drive? Slack?

I'm not defending AI, but I can come up with >10 products that would absolutely cripple the company I work at if the provider suddenly says "Soz, terms of service violation".

Vendor reliance is dangerous. That doesn't just apply to AI. If the company in OP's message had both Claude and Gemini they'd been okay, so the problem isn't with AI explicitly - the problem is with reliance on services that are critical for workflows, and providers being able to change their mind at a moment's notice.

In any case, leaving aside where the problem is, the idea that 60 employees can't use Natural Intelligence to do their jobs means there's something really wrong with that company...

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

First of all, I'm going to say that I don't think this comparison actually makes sense and I was just entertaining the question of the message I was replying to - humans are machines are way too different to reduce the comparison to merely "which is more energy efficient".

But second, I compared to the same level - I stopped at infrastructure. I didn't consider the costs (energy or otherwise) of building a solar panel or power plants in the same way I didn't consider the costs of a frying pan, a hob, or farms. Because if we do that, then any point we make about this needs to be a 500 page dissertation, not a Lemmy message.

The good news is that data for how much material/energy is required for a solar panel is freely available, and also that a solar panel can be used for energy generation many more times than a cow.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Well, in pure energy usage, no; however if you take into account the energy usage of the whole chain, they're orders of magnitude better.

After all, they can even be hooked up to a solar panel directly. For us to get 2000 kJ of energy, we need to water plants for a year, transport them, spend more than 2000 kJ of electricity cooking, and that's not even considering raising an animal for x months or years which needs >5000 kJ a day to just exist. Our sun->movement energy efficiency rate is pretty appalling and orders of magnitude worse than a robot's - even if the robot is just hooked onto the regular grid.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 18 points 4 days ago (5 children)

My money would be on Mandarin but... Boy it's a hard language. The English has a few quirks but it is an EASY language compared to most, including French. IMO, this and not number of native speakers or economic power alone explains best English overtaking French and establishing itself as de facto lingua franca of the 21st century.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 45 points 5 days ago

How can you ever depict a gay relationship in a game without "being woke"? By having the characters say "no homo" loudly and high five while they fuck? I swear right-wing asswipes find new mental gymnastics routines every day to redefine what they mean with this word.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The only thing is that the 8GB Framework 12 is a bit more expensive than the (8GB) MacBook Neo, and if you get it to 16GB it starts getting close to MacBook Air territory. But if you can sacrifice the nice build quality and nice screen plus spend some extra £, you can get Linux and a repairable laptop.

In any case: Windows is just not a value proposition anymore. Why pay extra to deal with Intel, MS and Copilot?

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Of course not; in the eyes of Tories, all Muslims have brown skin, which is BAD. But Jews are white, so that's "good".

I cannot comprehend how Kemi Badenoch can be okay with racist policies. It's like gay Republicans in the US, I guess... Crazy cognitive dissonance.

Surely the leopards wouldn't eat my face...

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No matter how many times they try to make it sound like the same thing, anti-zionism is very distinctly not antisemitism.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

It used to be really hard to defend Apple and the pricing of their "budget" lines. But these days it seems manufacturers are trying HARD to make apple look like the sensible option.

£1099 for a 2 year old processor, 1080p, 256GB and 16GB RAM, and it doesn't even run linux but windows? How's that better than a £1099 Macbook Air that comes with a better screen, brand new processor, 512GB and the same 16GB of RAM?

At this point you're paying extra for the privilege of dealing with Windows and Copilot. 🙄

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At the risk of being called a corporate bootlicker, it sounds like it isn't their own, it was their employer's.

If it's your own, absolutely, fair play. If it's your employer's... Then it feels murkier. I wouldn't blame their IT department for being quite cross if/when time comes to upgrade and return the laptop and give it a second life. For example, I would be quite pissed if IT gave me a defaced laptop like this as a loaner while mine is getting repaired.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think it's quite like that, I think it's more that an important part of these drugs is the release mechanism - and any two given brands will work differently for a given person.

I take long release methylphenidate (Ritalin/Concerta being the most known brands). I started with Medikinet because that's the main recommendation from my healthcare provider. It turned out it releases most of the dosage in the short term and at 40mg doses I constantly felt like I was at an airport with my boarding gate closing in seconds.

Moved to Meflynate, which is also methylphenidate hydrochloride, and now I'm a happy bunny.

My point being - it's not that generics are bad necessarily, it's more like, only a certain brand(s) will work for you. Whether for you that's the more expensive or cheaper one, it's a bit of a lottery really.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I have never seen "immense" spelled that way!

 

There is a petition to repeal the Online Safety Act, which has a good name but creates a system where we are trading off encryption for backdoors and privacy for age verification. This is literally the opposite of "Online Safety" and I believe it threatens our digital rights as UK citizens.

I'd like to encourage everyone who believes in digital safety and privacy to sign it. The petition is sitting right now at 180k signatures—already past the point for it to be considered for debate in parliament, but higher support would still flag the urgency and importance of this.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24429387

Article (archive link): https://archive.is/WZjn9

view more: next ›