I'm confident the the people deriding you are:
-50% bots
-25% class enemies acting in bad faith
-24% people who have gotten duped by the above
-1% Ted Danson
I_Voxgaard
joined 4 years ago
The argument operates in an idealist realm where the average person is aligned with the ruling class.
The surveillance largely serves to buttress property rights rather than public safety. Further, many technically "illegal" activities are entirely legitimate until the working class is liberated - so resisting the state's ability to deploy mass surveillance is simply part of the class struggle.
Will this convince a bootlicker? No. Yet, this is why the argument is misleading/false.
well he failed
Tell me how to not have a "live" MS account associated with my profile without having to do clandestine IT hijinks, etc
windows is hot trash
They only seem different because they were allowed a little democratic socialism, as a treat (until the USSR fell)
yep, this is correct. The state loathes identification exemptions
You expect this scenario to somehow be an exception to 
?
yeah they still have the airwaves on lock
are you antisemitism concern trolling or new?
Even if our elections were "democratic" (they aren't), there is absolutely no chance of voting this shit away before it is foisted onto the population.
Have we learned nothing from Obama