FriendBesto

joined 3 years ago
[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Guess it will depend if Israel tells him to.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Brave's adblockers us subpar in comparison to uBlock Origin and their tool set. It is not only about block lists.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Personally, I think it is BS.

They downed 2 pilots. What is an A-10, an air to ground, anti-tank support aircraft and a F15e doing so deep into Iran territory? Found the airstrip the C130 landed and it is south of Tehran. Why are they there?

Why use C-130s to carry a so-called rescue mission? A large cargo plane that needs to land? When a far more nimble helicopter(s) could be used along with air support? With no need for an air strip and not provide such large and slow heat seeking missile/radar profile to hit?

Something else is going on. The downed pilot seems like a cover. Will see what I can find. But his is all very sus to me.


Edit:

No, it wasn't a pilot. It was a pilot, and a "weapons system operator," usually a Lt. or a Captain in rank. What is a WSO doing there? The pilot's rank was a Coronel and is the Vice-Wing commander of the USA in Jordan. WTF? Why was he there? Seems like they planning something, and that is why he was there? The WSO was not recovered, the other pilot was.

They then mounted a rescue, using PJs, which are top tier para-troopers. and that is why the A-10 was there.

The ACs where AC-130Js, high speed, specifically designed for the special operations which can carry two small, AH6 helicopters, which four were destroyed on the site. AH6s are not rescue aircraft, they do not have the range.

https://www.americanspecialops.com/usaf-special-operations/aircraft/ac-130j-ghostrider/

The claim right now is that the WSO broke his ankle on landing, hiked almost 8km and then climbed a 7,000ft mountain to hide? More likely he handed there. Right.

This all sounds like a recon operation of some sort gone wrong. I mean they sent so many assets. Likely because the WSO is a high value asset given the info he knows. They also claim that the two AC-130s got stuck in the sand? Yeah, no. One plane maybe, two planes? Extremely unlikely. Plus 100 rangers and Navy Seals? Plus two even more planes, C295s. Plus 2 lost drones. Also, Navy Seals generally do not do search and rescue it ain't their thing.

Checked the math, USA lost about $500 worth of aircraft in one day alone. The Iranian found an ID of a woman, Amada Ryder from the wreck of the planes who had Israel papers.

This rescue mission sounds like cheer propaganda and a decoy story.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No, Apple is just doing the governments' bidding due to laws.

The real goal down the line is this, to be put in place circa 2030. The goal really is control... with a healthy side of profit for all involved:

To have a Digital IDs that surveillances and montiors everything you are and do, that proxy control you. For your protection and for the children, of course.

The age restriction BS is just the up ramp towards this. Think about, why is it that like 15 countries are pushing this all of the sudden, within the smae window. From the UK, USA, Sweden, Australia, Spain, Brazil, etc. Then, CBDCs and then the scam of UBIs which will be used as means to control too, or did people really think that UBIs actually meant that kind governments are really going to give you some stipend cash for free and for nothing in return? Come on.

Politicians and technocrats are delusional utopian ideologues who think they know better than us on how to live our own lives.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

But at least we have the choice. Cows don't.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Albeit true, not to the extent of cows.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Grass is nutritionally poor. The reason we are smart in many ways is due to our varied diet. Even if we had evolutionary gone in that direction we would be dumber. Eating grass is a specialisation.

Also, we would not look like we do. If you look at the digestive track of a horse or a cow, you will see that they are longer. Carnivores have the shortest and we as omnivores are in between. Being an omnivote is a good thing and in the end, we can get more nutrition by hunting and gathering than by grassing.

Worth noting, while individual cows' behaviour and preferences vary greatly, the time spent feeding and ruminating usually adds up to 4-7 hours a day. Our society would be were we are today if we spent 7 hours as a species eating grass in order to make ir worthwhile.

Evolution can only evolve so much within an existing animal especies in order to specialise or fit in a survival niche. Hence you do not see sea crabs that can fly or flies that live in the bottom of the sea.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Cows only have 1 stomach. That is devided in 4 compartments.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 days ago

The proper term is, "War Crimes."

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

Very true. Additioally, younger people had not been affected by any major outbreak. There were documented cases that older people, who had survived different previous outbreaks from were not hit as badly in the Spanish flu due to ore-existing natural immunity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22148/table/a2000c209ttt00007/?report=objectonly


If interested this is a good read. Interesting bit:

"The New York City data also demonstrate that mortality among people aged 45 and older during the 1918–1919 pandemic influenza season was no worse than in surrounding years. For people under age 45, however, the 1918–1919 influenza season was very bad—people in this age group were far more likely to die of influenza than in previous years. Indeed, the age groups at highest absolute risk of dying during the 1918–1919 A(H1N1) pandemic were young children and young and middle-aged adults (Table 1-6).

These findings suggest that the early 1918 pandemic herald wave was spreading as early as February 1918, 6–7 months before the beginning of the explosive 1918–1919 pandemic. Relative to preceding influenza epidemic seasons, both the herald and pandemic waves caused proportionally more mortality in younger age groups but less mortality among those over 45 years of age, possibly as the result of recycling of an H1-like antigen from half a century earlier (Olson et al., 2004). "

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22148/#a2000c209rrr00209

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

Covid is a corona virus. 🤔

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

Well, yeah, the Covid vaccines do not stop you from getting Covid. Thought this was well stablished back in 2021. In that regard, nothing has changed.

The media and by proxy people blamed it on the unvaccinated. The fact is that the Covid shots do not elicit a strong and in most people even barely measurable IgA antibody response. Only an IgG in, that is want the product does, hence the claim that it will lower side effects when you do catch it, which is what you heard in the news. In the case of Covid, a strong IgA response would grant sterlizing immunity, when was the last rime you even heard that term used in the media after all these years? There is a reason.

And even if the vaccinated person gets a small response of IgA, it will be start dropping after about 2 weeks, so you will catch it then. Only short fix is ro get another shot. Up here in Canada, back then, they were telling high risk patients to think about getting another shot every 60-90 days.

You will always catch Covid if it is around, whether the people around you are vaccinated or unvaccinated. Sorry to say but this claim that this strain gets around the shot was nonsense even back then. Vaccinated people were always going to catch Covid. Symptoms should be lessen though. Pfizer, Moderna, Aztra Seneca et al, never actually claimed their products would provde sterilizing immunity in their legalese, only lessen symptoms.

view more: next ›