Lawyers are doing their jobs--there is just no legal basis, given how a LLM is built, that the mere act of training a model or generating a latent space infringes copyright. That said, Anthropic literally just got shit on for pirating a shit ton of training data but not the training itself--because actually downloading copies of a work without license is and always has been infringement.
FatCrab
joined 2 years ago
This is generally correct, though diffusion models and GPTs work in totally different ways. Assuming an entity had lawful access to the image in the first place, nothing that persists in a trained diffusion model can be realistically considered to be a copy of any particular training image by anyone who knows wtf they're talking about.
A lidel an' alte fun undzere sonim "A geto deym eybigen Jid!"
Effectuvely translates to:
An old story we've heard from our enemies, "A ghetto for the eternal kyke!"
- In Zaltsikn Yam, S. Ansky, ~1901
Never let a zionist lie to you that it was ever consensus among Jews to relocate to a new ghetto.
Even better, gorditas literally translate to little fat girls i believe (but maybe I'm wrong). Tbf, we have a processed sausage-alike that we call a hot dog so language and our perception of it is weird
What we need is robust decentralized multimodal energy production fit for the local area where it is installed and contributing to a well maintained distributed grid with multiple redundancies and sufficient storage so that incidental costs are minimized and uptime is effectively 100%. Energy is a tool and its generation is a category of tools, whining about people developing a better screwdriver rather than only using hammers is counterproductive when we're trying to build a house for as many people as possible that doesn't fucking kill everyone.
No? Anthropic's judge literally continued the case over the basis they admitted to torrenting (i.e., pirating) a huge number of books for their training repo. Meta did not do that afaik