Marx doesn't care about your individual participation in capitalism.
He was much more interested in systemic level critique. Your individual consumption will change nothing about the broader incentive structures that produce bad outcomes under capitalism.
Alright, I just don't understand what you mean by "a challenge in court". In this case, you couldn't challenge them on these rules, a court could do nothing about them.
From what I understand from their blogpost, it was mostly about conserving their own resources, because a lot of the vibecoded projects they got were uploading insane amounts of binary releases and wasting resources on CI/CD while having no users or other collaborators.
They wanna reserve more server space for projects, that actually productively use it, like bigger FOSS projects with actual users and contributors.
That is perfectly understandable for me, even without taking my huge distaste for AI into consideration. Anyone that thinks, that this small, community funded project is obligated to host their huge slop repos semms pretty entitled to me.
What do you mean? They are perfectly in their right to enforce this rule, even if they couldn't prove that their reasoning made sense. They are not obligated to host your slop
I was talking about you use of AI, which is based on plagiarizing art from it's training data
Why is your logo in the trailer and your banner AI slop?
I am sorry, but that doesn't seem worth engaging with at all. Also it is a pretty shitty thing to do to pretend to be an artist while shitting out slop with the plagarism machine.
Then resources and labour would be finite. You can't just escape scarcity.
And anyone who confuses the problems with capitalism and currency is an idiot and their economic arguments should not be taken seriously.
Average BWL student in Germany
Or in other words, capitalism
Nice!
She was a Zionist, so not worth voting for
They don't care, law doesn't really matter anymore