Cruel

joined 7 months ago
[–] Cruel@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Fucking children is always rape. But rape doesn't necessarily require fucking.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Name a single US Congress member that thinks Trump raped kids and is okay with it.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 30 points 1 month ago

Good for women who don't want to give birth, but still half-raise kids. You get a break from the kids during joint custody with ex-wife.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Idgi. What word are you supposed to use when referencing females now? It's not "woman," unless you're wanting to talk about gender. Or are people back to equating the two?

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're ghostly lol

Fade away when you're not nearby.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

What files? Are you talking about FBI investigative files prior to 2006? How do you even conclude it's a majority?

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

Didn't people complain about the lack of redactions for victims, even though it has now been confirmed, by those who viewed the unredacted files, that many of those redacted victims were trafficking minors and were authors of some of the questionable emails?

Yet when they take them down temporarily to review redactions, people are mad about that too?

People have all the documents backed up already. If they fail to restore any of them, then we'll know. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really? Accidental over-disclosure or improper redaction of legal documents only happens in countries "run by tax collecting pedophiles, rapists and war hawks"?

[–] Cruel@programming.dev -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Most of it is duplicative, most likely. But they might as well publish them at this point.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

They're the biggest and most used, and marginally most advanced. Admittedly, Google, Anthropic, and xAI are never really far behind, and sometimes even temporarily get ahead (in model performance). But things are moving fast enough for that to be important. The international AI arms race is very important to the government. They want to make sure the world uses AI (which ingests the world's data) from American companies instead of Chinese.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

They've been increasingly losing money. This is mostly because they were growing at a ridiculous rate over the past 3 years. Losing $14 billion is not unexpected. But it's also not detrimental. Tech companies like this are famous for growing with losses. All it takes is for OpenAI to go public and it'll become another Tesla, consistently overvalued.

view more: ‹ prev next ›