Buzztiger

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
esa
[–] Buzztiger@feddit.nl 0 points 6 months ago

Yes less transfer time is certainly beneficial. But for the arrival in the 2050s we are actually limited by the seasons and the amount of light. Enceladus spring starts around that time, it won't change much in terms of surface temperature (~100K) but before this time its even darker at the south pole. Its already only 1% of sun light so landing in complete darkness is making it even more challenging regarding visual navigation and scientific exploration.

 

If anyone is at the Open Day at ESTEC today there is a large surface model of Enceladus and the study team presenting the mission concept. It's in the Aldo van Eyck Building together with the other Space Science missions

[–] Buzztiger@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

Adding the ESA link with the English text : Link

[–] Buzztiger@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

Sniff, our most successful scientific Spacecraft by publications. The new Voyage 2050 programme certainly provides science topics that could lead to a worthy successor.

 

Can I ask how everyone personally feels about using nuclear material for space exploration? For the rovers heating elements it will be just a couple of grams but for generating electricity via a RTG a spacecraft would require several kilograms of radioactive material.