BangCrash

joined 2 years ago
[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

So basically like all of history

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I feel the word "war crime" has lost any meaning after the last few years

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

What ever reason china is doing is doesn't negate the fact no one of forcing or pressuring people to have kids.

What the country is doing is making it easier for those that choose to have kids to do so.

Lots people want to have kids but can't because life is so goddamn expensive at the moment.

This allows them to do that.

You are completely free to choose not to. To focus on and say "but what about me I don't want kids" has absolutely no bearing on the fact that lots of people do.

I'm happy for you to not have kids. I hope you grow old and boring. It sounds like we'd be better of if you dont procreate anyway.

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The fact you can't reflect on how your own words come across is a huge red flag

Good luck @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

The original comment was

"Anything that helps people that want to have children is good"

Your response was

"As long as people who don't want to have children aren't pressured. Not everyone is interested in parenting, and that needs to be accepted."

At no point was anyone's talking about forcing people to have kids. You've built a strawman and are arguing about something that nobody is talking about.

You. You have made it about yourself and are now trying to pretend you didn't.

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

Exactly it's not about you.

So why are you commenting that some people DONT WANT KIDS and this shouldnt be forced on us.

You are making it about yourself.

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Sure but that's a totally different discussion than the other commentor making it about themselves

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That would make it a SLM

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)

How have you taken a good thing for people and turned it into a bad thing for you.

Can't you just be happy for others without making it about yourself?

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

And what's funny is she probably was pregnant and just in denial

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

And more invasive. And expensive.

But hey not about womans things

[–] BangCrash@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Doesn't sound illegal at all. Immoral sure. But there's no way governments have created a law to make asking for social logins illegal

view more: next ›