BallyM

joined 2 years ago
[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

The Real IRA “issued an evacuation order” just before the Omagh Bombing

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

Excellent!

I had filed an EU Ombudsman complaint about the European Parliament incessantly pushing X and other US big tech platforms on its website.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Omg Chomsky went to collect his prize too. That’s depressing.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Depends what you mean by preaching non-violence. If it includes conscientious objectors supporting other soldiers to quit, then I disagree. There’s plenty of that happening right now in the US, Russia, Ukraine, and elsewhere. They are the biggest threat to the state and to capitalism

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Saved you a click:

Most of the Bundeswehr strategy remains classified

According to the military strategy, Russia represents "the greatest and most immediate threat for the foreseeable future" to Germany and transatlantic security: "Russia is laying the groundwork for a military attack on NATO member states."

The document then goes on to analyze how the Bundeswehr should respond to potential war scenarios, such as a Russian attack on NATO territory, though the details are classified.

"It goes without saying that we cannot make these scenarios public. Otherwise, we might as well add Vladimir Putin to our mailing list," Pistorius said.

 

Nothing to worry about: just German elites continuing where they left off 80 years ago. Carry on.

 

Do BBC editors think that their readers won’t notice the double-standard?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj40r2gw24wo

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Greek gov commits to waste billions on warships—that’s the story.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

EU: “Deeply concerned.”

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I wonder what could have prompted this? 🤔

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

OpenAI's Sam Altman says today that they're gonna take Anthropic's place on DoW classified networks (https://xcancel.com/sama/status/2027578652477821175#m).

Still, Anthropic being designated a "supply chain risk" is good news, as it means Claude cannot officially be used anymore by the Pentagon and by all of its suppliers. That's massive.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good discussion of this on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188473

I haven't read anyone say that it was about retaining the IP. Anthropic says, and others agree, that it would be totally irresponsible to use current frontier AI systems for lethal autonomous weapon systems -- even if you think that LAWS are okay. Current AI systems are far too error-prone.

See https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war and https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-comments-secretary-war

 

Google and OpenAI staff, many of them AI researchers, have signed an open letter saying they share Anthropic’s red lines. Privately OpenAI bosses agree.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (12 children)

What if you drink alcohol or use recreational drugs? You can still take the bus and won’t endanger anyone (unless you’re totally off your head). Drink/drugged drivers are a danger to everyone.

 

Setting aside Big Tech and surveillance capitalism for a minute — I wonder if fediverse microblogging apps like Mastodon aren’t fairly antisocial and inclined to individualism, while apps like Lemmy are more community and artefact/stuff-to-share centric.

People are complex, societies infinitely more so, but software can nudge us this way or that way too.

I’d be interested to hear what others here think.

view more: next ›