Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk

With the collapse of the NDP they're free to shift right and de-mask to a higher degree.

What are you going to do, vote conservative?

Mens rei is a thing. For murder you need to prove they intended the result, not just that they intended the action.

That's why charges like negligent homicide exist.

Firefox has a new CEO who is pivoting the project into being an "AI Browser".

Because we live in a universe of finite resources. So maybe be efficient, and do the things that work best first. When we have a budget surplus we can talk about where to spend that.

The government Americans have is one Americans freely chose. But not everyone voted for it, and expecting them to hang around and fix the errors of the majority is dubious logically. Where does this duty to risk life and limb to save others (many of whom hate you already and would hate you more if you tried) from the consequences of their own actions come from?

If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you feel a responsibility to jump after them?

Baby steps.

All private ownership of land is deeply morally suspect. Nobody made that valley, someone was violent enough to make a claim stick. Usually several people, over a long period.

Now that he's convicted, an interesting question might be "is there enough evidence to convict him in other countries who have extradition treaties with South Korea?"...

I have limited sympathy for people who make their living by bothering people.

Yes, you have been very clear about your conclusions. And completely opaque about everything else.

At this point I'm pretty much convinced... that you're very carefully not saying anything about "why" you think it's bad he was killed.

You've given nobody any reason to agree with you, and nothing to disagree with. So all I can say is "Yes, that is your opinion" and move on.

I clearly stated my point. Killing someone who kills a lot of other people is murder. But it being murder isn't evidence it's wrong. You dismissed that without addressing it.

You've never said one thing about why you think it's wrong, other than that it's murder. I figured you were a hardcore deontologist. What is there to discuss? It breaks the law and is therefore evil from that point of view.

I asked for more info on why, you refused. What do you think I am to talk about here? Am I meant to guess your thoughts and argue with that?

I got made fun of for crying when my grandfather died. Over 30 years ago. So I stopped.

Nobody was confused about your opinion on that.

You keep telling us what your opinion is as if that will convince us to agree. You're not god handing me stone tablets on the mountain. You need an argument, not just a claim.