Await8987

joined 3 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
macOS 26.4 will notify users of Rosetta 2 discontinuation - 9to5Mac in c/technology@beehaw.org
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Other way round I believe rosetta was to run x86 compiled apps on arm chips. So they are just pulling up the bridge to avoid a situation where developers feel like just making an intel/amd binary that will work on both platforms

Microsoft says it's going to focus on the things that matter for Windows 11, such as improving performance in c/technology@beehaw.org
Microsoft says it's going to focus on the things that matter for Windows 11, such as improving performance in c/technology@beehaw.org
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

This for sure

Workflow artifacts from forgejo runner not accessible from other workflows in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
Workflow artifacts from forgejo runner not accessible from other workflows in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

@just_another_person@lemmy.world The runner picks up the task and when they are in the same workflow file the tasks are executed on the same run_id (as far as I understand) which means when using download artifacts code: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/download-artifact/src/tag/v4/ the request for artifacts works correctly as the request has the right ID. But sadly when they are separate tasks it requests the wrong ID (as I understand) and the section in the readme about downloading from other workflow runs is incorrect as its just mirrored from github, and the run_id and token field is not implemented which is discussed in this ticket. But I am shocked that everyone is not running into this? Still think im being dumb...

14
Workflow artifacts from forgejo runner not accessible from other workflows (feddit.uk)
 

Hi all, I have recently started using Forgejo runners and it's a great tool. I have run into this surprising limitation with accessing artifacts and I wonder if I am just doing something totally wrong?

If I use the artifacts within the same workflow file as per the tests: e2e test then this works as you would expect. But if you have two separate workflow files, so example one with a build step, and one with a deploy step. then the deploy step has no way to access the artifacts?

I also found an open issue which indicates that the github implementation for accessing the artifacts using a token is not currently possible either.

I am surprised I have not seen more people talking about this, so I wonder if I am just doing something really obviously wrong! The fundamental part is that I am using uses: to specify the first stage from the other workflow file.

Where am I going wrong?

jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: docker
    uses: ./.forgejo/workflows/build.yml

  deploy:
    needs: build
People using Cloudflare, are you still happy with it? Would you consider any self-hosted alternative? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Any company funded by venture capital is coming for your money eventually, whatever they say in the short term.

Google’s new Android source code release schedule is bad news for custom ROMs in c/technology@beehaw.org
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago

Disagree this is bad news, stable is more important tbh

The painful questions for Nato and the EU as Trump threatens Greenland in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

There is still a pipe dream that next election USA will go back to normal... Spoiler alert: its gone

The EU plans to roll out a series of laws in 2026 which aim at a single objective: reducing the reliance on foreign tech companies in c/europe@feddit.org
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

I would really love to know how they think this ends. Its like they either cant see 2 moves ahead or they are just delusional

Best subsonic alternative? in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

OP I'm fairly certain your issue is with your music file metadata rather than the software. I suspect if you clean it with musicbrainz picard or open it with a tag editor you will find its using slightly different characters in different metadata fields. You can test this by loading up one of the offending files, clearing all of its metadata and see if that looks better!

Everyone's talking about the new Fairphone (Gen. 6) in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
Linux smashes through five per cent desktop share in the US in c/technology@beehaw.org
[–] Await8987@feddit.uk 14 points 11 months ago

Long may it continue!!

view more: next ›