It's a miracle they don't make you pay every time you set foot on a paved road.
Aria
joined 3 years ago
Do you lecture people about how your country is a democracy and whatever enemy country is a dictatorship?
Just the fact that the USA can credibly threaten to use nukes means it's completely rational and normal for everyone else to want nukes of their own. Liberals say Kim Jong-Un is insane specifically because he uses this justification for why the DPRK's possession and testing of nukes is legitimate, and the western press insists the premise is flawed: That the USA would never ever consider using nukes.
That's stupid. They literally already have. And that's why this threat feels credible too. If the threat is credible (and that's up to your own interpretation here), then the basis for calling Kim Jong-Un insane is invalid.
Btw, I had finally got my permaban on Reddit by stating that it is time for a retaliation on Israel’s logistics railway.
What did the mod-message say? Seems extra nakedly hypocritical with all the genocidal screenshots I've seen off there.
Ew. The UK wasn't enough backwardness?
(The USA is an) imperfect system (striving for equality)
(China, Russia, North Korea, are) formal(ly) (unequal) (...) corrupt system(s).
Could you explain to me why among these, only the USA one meets your par?
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Russia
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Socialist_Constitution_of_the_Democratic_People%27s_Republic_of_Korea_(2016)
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America
You can use AI to summarise them. Or talk about individual articles. Really any sort of justification for why anyone could read these and think the USA one is the best one, never mind in a league of it's own, is extremely fascinating.
Do you have even one bit of anecdotal evidence that he has fixed or improved anything? Or maybe a plan where there would be a dip and then a projected growth and we're in the dip-phase per his proposed timeline?
The Reuters captcha is ridiculous. They load the full article, and then present the captcha. Which means that bots don't even see it.
I disagree with it being a defense for Mamdani. Mamdani is not unknown, and his rhetoric is getting less radical as he's increasing in fame-derived protection. Rather you should take what Truly said to mean that he was vetted as this type of person before he was allowed to become influential.
In the USA, liberal democracy was legitimised on a framework apartheid, following public lynchings, following a genocide and cattle slavery. The optics in the USA have always been vile, and yet their PR is able to dictate the narrative. Even right now they have more political prisoners than anywhere else, yet the average liberal wouldn't label the governance as "oppressive".
There has been a period of fewer political assassinations in the USA. (Or they're better at hiding them). We can safely presume they found lower risk and higher return strategies, but that doesn't mean we can infer the risk was ever high.
view more: next ›
Which video platform have you moved to?