Yea the comments are all as I expected them to be
AnonomousWolf
You can easily replace Beef in your diet with foods that aren't as bad for the environment. It won't taste the same but so what.
You can't cry that nobody needs AI but then in the same breath say that you can't replace beef Something 100x worse for the environment.
Yes nobody NEEDS AI, just like nobody NEEDS beef, or to take a flight, but it's still a nice to have and useful to a lot of people.
Read the actual article, that's my whole point. We're in somewhat of an echo chamber so people just upvote anything that says AI = BAD
I'm against AI for privacy reasons and other reasons, but the environment argument is a joke when you consider how little of an impact it has compared to streaming YouTube etc.
It's already included in the 3Wh calculation
Probably still worse than a couple of AI prompts
Why are they nazi bar?
Genuinely curious IDK much about them
Beef is useful? You could just eat chicken and other meats instead. And you be saving the environment 100x more than not using AI
@draconic_neo@lemmy.dbzer0.com your input would be appreciated here.