Did you mean "basic?"
AmidFuror
Or have Parkinson's.
Or terrorists and authoritarians.
Shouldn't the OP be posting something more recent, then? Just reading the title of the post, I thought Hegseth must have reversed the recent mandate once again.
I know this isn't a news community, but posting an April story in June after significant developments is not great.
Actually, how does it fit this community at all?
The way I read it, the commenter does not believe moderation prevents harm. Hence the "wisdom" in quotes. But they're for the freedom to self-"abuse."
Everyone knows that Societ sunscreen was the pinnacle of effectiveness and issued according to need.
Acceptable blackface.
Can someone explain how to get to a linked article?
Streets are for emptying chamber pots.
The gist is that science funding is under attack by Trump. The tie-in to GLP-1 peptides is that scientific research funded by the government more than 30 years ago led to the discovery of such compounds. It's the usual story of the eventual utility of basic research being a good reason to fund it. This is the particular story the writer chose to highlight.
The grammar in OP's first paragraph is a disturbing crime but doesn't meet the other criteria.