0xDEADBEEFCAFE

joined 2 years ago
[–] 0xDEADBEEFCAFE@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Everything Herb Sutter says about the popularity of C++ should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

[–] 0xDEADBEEFCAFE@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

Right, so you can't "enforce" a return from the function.

[–] 0xDEADBEEFCAFE@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

shouldn’t Rust enforce returning from function

How do you enforce returning from exit or a function with a loop that never terminates?

[–] 0xDEADBEEFCAFE@programming.dev 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're kidding yourself if you think most people in this thread are actually programmers. Most people here wouldn't know the difference between C and Rust code if they saw it, let alone be able to write anything in either language.

 

I can't wait to try out the groundbreaking but still traditional and comfortable C++ Profiles that are going to be "designed", "verified", and "implemented" in the span of about 3 years by the sharpest minds on the committee operating under the assumption that everybody is out to get them and that this feature is not only absolutely essential to the survival of C++ but at the same time the result of pointless bureaucracy cooked up by the perverted minds that seek to corrupt our way of life.

I am absolutely certain that I will be able to test out the feature in a functional compiler before the release of C++26.

 

Turns out we don't need a borrow checker after all. We can just use vague "AI code reasoning". This seems highly credible and I'm sure we're going to see a fully functional compiler and source release within the next 10 decades.

 

Least delusional C++nile.