this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

7936 readers
16 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world
Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social
53
Microsoft-backed research team builds hollow-core cable with lowest signal loss recorded in optical fiber (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 10 months ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/hardware@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is really cool! Existing DNANF cables have crazy low latency, but have too much signal loss to be used outside of datacenters basically.

The DNANF design solves this by using concentric glass tubes that are just microns thick. These act like tiny mirrors, bouncing the light back into the air core and suppressing higher-order modes. Testing this on 15km spools using multiple measurement methods, including optical time-domain reflectometry, confirmed attenuation under 0.1 dB/km.

Seems like this new design solves that problem, which might mean these could be used over longer distances. This could significantly reduce latency of the internet as a whole.

Now to fix the stranglehold ISPs have on (esp American) infrastructure…

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How does lower loss improve latency?

[–] skibidi@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lower loss in general means fewer repeaters, and repeaters always add latency.

For this cable specifically, the optical signal spends significant time traveling through air, which has a lower index of refraction (higher signal speed) than the solid-glass cables in common use.

The article abstract claims a 45% improvement in signal speed, which would reduce latency over longer distances simply because the information arrives sooner.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you.

[–] englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

As far as I understand, the latency is improved by the different speed of light of the DNANF: In conventional fibres, it is limited by the refractive index of glass, reducing the speed of light in it to ~70% of speed of light in vaccum (Wikipedia on this topic). In this new concept, the light travels 45% faster.

I think, the lower loss (lower attenuation) is "just" an enabler for long distances: You can easily have hundreds of km without repeaters – and repeaters for DNANF cables would add latency. If they can get attenuation improved a bit more, they may even be able to cross the Atlantic ocean without repeaters.

As a nice side effect, those DNANF cables have very little dispersion, so you can get rid of compensating for that, which will reduce latency too.