this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

49250 readers
678 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally this was a reply to this article about a Windows feature called Recall, but there's a good argument the author's concerns resonate far beyond Windows and Meta to proprietary generally.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

"im a henchman for a bad guy....and lemme tell you...I think we might be starting to do bad stuff...not sure yet..."

Thanks bud

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At some point we need to start welcoming people to the Light, instead of demonizing them for having been in the Dark. It's pretty difficult for me not to dunk on people as they wake up to the nightmare that they voted for, but a lot them ARE actually otherwise decent folks. Making America Great is going to involve deprogramming a lot of people.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

That's all good and well and I agree with you, but I also believe if you have and are continuing to feed the machine, then you don't get to be put on a pedestal or respected for recognizing how bad the machine is. This person is repeating something that is already very well known and accepted and is simultaneously adding to the alarm while causing it. I have extremely low patience for that particular brand of person. They are continuing to cause the problem they are rallying against.

If I were face to face with this person, I'd genuinely say "either quit working there or shut the fuck up."

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, not everyone has a choice in who they work for in end-stage-capitalism. Work is about survival, not ideology. The majority of Americans are not far-right capitalists, but the vast majority of CEOs are, and it's not really possible to survive long enough to start a small business in most of the US without investment from a far-right capitalist or inheritance (usually also from a far-right capitalist family member).

[–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you have the skillset and CV to work at Meta, you have a choice to work somewhere slightly lower on the scale of exploitation.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"I'm only following orders!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People gotta earn money to survive, I don't blame the employees for this. And this is not just a case of Meta's privacy being bad. This is close government involvement with potentially serious impacts and implications across all US based platforms.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

It makes sense to continue working there but then leak everything to an independent journalist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's funny how they're saying "You need to use Linux" and not "You need to get off Facebook". How's Linux going to save you from Facebook spying on you?

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They literally work for the Fediverse branch of meta, sure its an evil corp and zucks intentions aren't exactly pure (more than likely an effort to lower server costs) but it is something likely to put more eyes onto the fediverse which I definitely think will benefit the fediverse in the long run.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That first comma is a bit out of place - 'why won't you just try, Linux?'
'seriously Linux, just try your vegetables'.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It can't. Its just a kernel. Maybe with the right gnu core utils...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've done OSINT research and that alone converted me into a privacy advocate. Seeing how Alphabet, Meta, and MS have allowed creep to get training data... Whew. It's breathtaking and complicated beyond the ability to explain in 114 characters.

Y'all, we are cooked. Currently. Present tense. If you aren't freaked out already, you're missing about 85% of reality.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah OSINT existing is proof that no backdoor is secure, not even mentioning what you can buy from data brokers, something authorities wouldn't need warrants for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 year ago

US corporate "leadership" has a rapists mentality. Consent is not needed. They will do the crime either way. and daddy sam let's them get away with it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Switching from Windows to Linux isn't going to block them from monitoring your use of online services. Facebook doesn't even do anything in the OS space.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I think what they are getting at is that Meta does this and they find it likely Microsoft might be doing something similar.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

They have an agreement with MS, so they are definitely doing something there.

[–] Beryl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this was a weird way for them to phrase this. You can use Meta stuff on Linux and Fediverse stuff on Windows.

load more comments (1 replies)

If this is the same person I think it is, I would take their comments with a huge pile of salt. Not saying they're wrong, but...

A couple years ago this Linux-Is-Best dipshit somehow got onboarded as a mod of the /r/massachusetts subreddit, started banning a ton of users for pretty unreasonable reasons, brought a few other seemingly random moderators on board and almost nuked it out of existence by being an unhinged little weirdo. They claimed to have worked at Facebook/Meta and I forget which, but they were found out either to have made it up or they were just a bottom tier content moderation employee.

You can go find some posts about it, but this person's not well at all even if you happen to agree with them. If this is the same person. They're not trust worthy. Privacy's important, big companies are creepy, do what you can to protect yourself and use linux if that's what gets you there, but again I would take anything this dipshit says with a grain of salt.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/11wsnla/mod_of_3_months_in_rmassachusetts_purges_members/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Massachusetts_US/comments/11wnjsk/removed_by_reddit/

https://www.reddit.com/r/massachusetts/comments/11xw44r/linux_is_gone/

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Look, Software shouldn't be free and open Source. I really like that we probably have a decade left of it before it gets bundled with ad services which it should have been from the start. The more people that adopt it means that it's only a matter of time as long as we all just passively watch it get usurped

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fediverse isn't ready for this level of sarcasm. Look at those downvotes, lmao.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] upbeatoffbeat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly in the privacy agreements is this person worried about? All I’m seeing is PANIC but without a reason given…

[–] albert180@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've wanted to switch to OpenSUSE for quite some time now from Fedora for the same reason. Should really do it now

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Its so beautifully stable, without giving you ancient software like Debian. Never had an issue using it n its got a grandma level installation.

load more comments
view more: next ›