this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

ISO - Incredible Solutions Only

772 readers
4 users here now

Anything is possible if you are creative enough. Who needs ISO/OSHA/DIN standards or safety precautions?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeadPand@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you really suggesting that workers attack safety inspectors like OSHA? The fuck?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago

But... They won't let us have forklift races and make us wear our helmets! So, clearly they're the enemy...

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't the safety inspector on the workers side.

Never endanger yourself for your job unless those risks are a stipulated part of the job.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They're there to prevent lawsuits against the company

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Nnnno, they're there because the company legally has to have them, and they hate it.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago

... by making the workplace safer.

The one preventing non-deadly lawsuits is HR.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

I have a love/hate relationship with workplace safety. I love a safe workplace, but many areas have stupid regulations and requirements just for the sake of looking like they're safe or because they don't want the liability of customizing things for certain situations which just makes things harder/uncomfortable for workers.

Saw a work crew the other day with hardhats on. Working outdoors, doing survey type work in an area with absolutely nothing overhead. It was completely unnecessary but required to meet "safety" rules.

That's just one example.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago