Awesome love that
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Doomers
339 readers
4 users here now
Musings and discussion surrounding the end of human civilization
Guidelines:
- Anyone can post
- Keep discussion civil and be respectful of others
- Keep content on-topic
- Appropriately label any NSFW content
- Do not post bigoted or hateful speech, nor incite violence or encourage criminal behavior
- Do not harass others
- Do not post extreme or offensive content
- Violations of any guideline will be subject to removal of post, public or private admonition, or temporary or permanent user removal at the discretion of any moderator
- Spam will be removed
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He's not wrong, but he's not right either. We have to decide how much warming we are going to allow. We can still brunt the worst effects of climate change.
Exactly. And i want to do as much as i possibly can to protect as many people and animals and biodiversity as i can. If we can help places from being hit harder, we should do it. If we can prevent 1 forest from burning down, 1 village from being flooded, 1 person dying from heat stroke, we should do it.
The climate is fucked. This will get worse and worse. But we can still make the difference in whether a forest burns down 100% or 90%.