THIS COMM HAS MOVED
Liechtenstein or Andorra perhaps. Bit too small for "empire". Or Kosovo, given that they haven't been independent for that long.
It's a fool's errand. What you really want is a country with a strong social safety net and vivid regrets about their recent imperialism.
I had somebody trying to tell me Bhutan was the perfect communism a couple of weeks ago.
It's a monarchy where everybody lives like medieval peasants so that the rich and powerful can run the world's most exclusive resort off their labor.
Most counties which formed by separating from an empire.
I mean, I guess you'd need to narrow the definition a bit.
I was thinking of a lot of former colonialised nations, but lots of those also have history of conquest before they became colonised.
Then Finland? Well, by our actions, pretty much. But O can't say that it was because people didn't want to.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Finland
Perhaps "proto-imperialist" would be better suited to describe that. Well, irredentist, officially. (Rather rare, didn't know that word.)
Bit of a problem there, yeah. This hostage taker needs to define both "imperialist" and "country", or I'm shoving his ass into 2006-founded Montenegro and accepting zero complaints about it.
The Federal Republic of Germany is non-imperialist, since it's imperialist predecessors ceased to exist and a new nation was formed
Genius strategy. Just rename your country and change its constitution etc, your new country will have committed zero atrocities! Never mind that you'll continue to profit from the predecessor country's imperialism.
Please tell me how Germany continues to profit from Imperialism
Assuming you're genuinely asking (not always easy to tell on the internet, sorry):
The same way every formerly imperialist country benefits from imperialist legacy. Global economic inequality is neither a coincidence nor the result of some natural order. It's of little benefit if I do a detailed write up on this topic since there's tons of those coming up in a search engine. Here's an example: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-impact-colonialism
I know it's not on Germany specifically, but imo it explains the principle quite well. Hope it helps, otherwise, 'does the west still profit from imperialism' was a useful search query for me.
Well, the FRG (BRD) is the legal successor of the German Empire. The GDR (DDR) always emphasized, it/she is not.
That is so but the German Reich as an entity still exists but completely lost his people and all state organs, institutions and public authorities. Technically is still has land, that is occupied by FRG and Poland today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Germany
There are some Germans that think they can declare themselves citizens of the German Reich. But that can't be as there are no authorities of the German Reich anymore that can conduct immigration processes.
That is somewhat true, yet following the theory of continued existence (Fortbestandstheorie), as both German states on German ground united into the BRD, the BRD is no longer only partially identical with the German empire, but subject-identical.
Assuming one accepts the USSR and its bloc as inherently non-imperialistic.
If so, though, good news: the DDR still exists. There’s an uninhabited island off Cuba that Fidel Castro gifted to the DDR, which has not passed into possession of the Bundesrepublik.
The Ernst Thälmann Island (Cayo Ernesto Thaelmann) was only named after the KPD leader, but not gifted to the DDR in terms of its territory. While, the English Wikipedia article is not distinct in that point and mentions the island being "gifted", the German one is very clear, that only its name should honour the substitute saint of the DDR Ernst Thälmann while the territory remained part of Cuba.
Just ask Greece how non-imperialist Germany is. /j
Also: Economic warfare is a form of warfare, too.
Ah yes putting conditions on loaned money equals warfare
Strawman