this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Firefox

22689 readers
51 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.

I'm afraid they aren't wrong. The majority of people aren't going to pay for access to random blogs etc. So we'd end up with only the big players having usable sites.

People kick off about ads but rarely suggest an alternative to funding the internet.

Back in the day ads were targeted based on the website's target audience not the user's personal data. It works fine but is less effective. Don't see why they couldn't go that way.

[–] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Internet was fine in the early 2000s before the rise of social media platforms resulted in surveillance advertisement complex.

It was a different place, but worked ok.

[–] dan@upvote.au 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're forgetting about the dot com bubble. The internet wasn't fine abck then because nobody really had a sustainable business model.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] dan@upvote.au 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The reason I mentioned the dot com bubble is because a lot of the companies back then failed because they couldn't figure out a sustainable business model. It was mostly hype-driven with the idea of getting users first, then figuring out monetization later.

That's why we have ad-supported sites today. It was the main business model that was the most sustainable.

There were a lot of small sites, sure, but a lot of them were hosted on services with no real business model. Even back then, not a lot of people self-hosted.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The enshitification of Firefox continues 😢

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] ramblingsteve@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I honestly never expected the final death blow for Firefox to come from Mozilla.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe they've been infiltrated by bad actors from Google, parading around as pro-privacy frauds.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator