this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

48653 readers
220 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This doesn't surprise me at all... Just like bots in games. Selling a service that benefits another. Its shady, but definitely believable.

Also, what if this is an actual viable way to "market" for an open source project?

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/over-31-million-fake-stars-on-github-projects-used-to-boost-rankings

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also cybersecurity implications here. Nefarious actors can prop up their evildoings with fake stars and pose as legitimate projects.

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

my first thought. I usually rely on stars for "trustworthiness" of random projects before running their code.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would it be? Software is good based on it's use and recommendations from real folk, not *s. Many project not on github

[–] minyaen@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd argue that the project can be good and not widely used. Do you think that there are projects with real use case and are great open source software and not widely used because its buried under the *s?

It could be a relatively inexpensive way for niche marketing. Especially if the developer has a payment option with the software. Probably a decent way to get the software out in the open for profitability, no?

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]