this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60076 readers
636 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://feddit.org/post/9959466/5697405

[why blocked?] "a contributor made a push from a sanctioned region is what i saw. not even a main dev, and they didn’t receive any warning is my understanding. i might be way off, i’m not a final source:

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not that I condone Microsoft, but if it is a sanctioned country (Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc.). Microsoft will be in shit with the US government if they let it there.

If the project has contributors from there, then I guess they need to move off GitHub like they did.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So now we know how to instantly delist any project on GitHub.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Step 1: Get write access to the project you dislike.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Seems like a vulnerability to exploit

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a really strong argument for not depending on non-federated, centrally controlled services. It doesn't matter which country or company is behind Your Favorite Service™, they can be legally mandated to by Oppressive Regime ("it could never happen in my country!"), or they could just be arbitrary assholes.

I don't care why Microsoft did it. I moved off Github when MS acquired them, although in this case it probably wouldn't have made a difference. Regardless, what it proves is that you can not rely on a monopoly.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think federation saves us. If the server owners are in the states they still have to comply. I don't know for certain, but I think if there are us citizens using it, some laws might compel non us based servers as well.

The only way around it that I can think of is tor. That doesn't make it legal it would just be harder to stop.

All of this is assuming the US justice department would even care enough though.

https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/03/us-government-reminds-non-us-companies-to-comply-with-sanctions-and-export-controls

A non-US person that causes a US person to violate US sanctions or engage in conduct that evades US sanctions may itself become subject to US sanctions.

I don't know the text of the sanctions, but lemmy.world could be under US jurisdiction if they allow me to violate sanctions.

Seems pretty dumb to me that the US has been allowed to assert itself this much.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the benefit of using distributed tools like git.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ooh, I didn't know that someone had developed a mechanism to move issues and PRs.

I remember commenting on the fact that while it's easy to move the source repo itself from location to location, as git makes that easy and self-contained, issues and PRs didn't enjoy that.

[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Forgejo seems pretty good, I'll move my stuff there too