this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
62 points (95.6% liked)

News

39923 readers
2805 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google announced on Tuesday that it plans to disable AI tools for K-12 students next year unless school administrators explicitly turn them on. The tech giant says the change follows consultations with schools, teachers, leading researchers, and policymakers. As a result, Google is revising its approach across Gemini, NotebookLM, Gemini in Classroom, and Google Search.

The decision means that schools choosing to restrict AI altogether will no longer be able to access Google Search, as AI features are now integrated into the search engine.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Great! Another great reason to move to Ecosia, or Qwant, or something else!

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Win win?

No AI, no Google.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Does it really mean that? You can always type -ai into the search prompt to remove the ai features so that doesn't seem to be the case right now.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It sounds like they are switching their AI tools in schools to opt-in, where the school chooses for their network? Not sure how that is set up but I mean... What would be bad about that?

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

I would be stoked if they did it in a reasonable manner and not a "well ai is too baked in so you can't use any Google services" which is why I was questioning the op

[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a threat? Couldn't they just use anything else? Also how do google know its a school? Its been a while since I was in school but almost none of us logged into google and we didn't have google accounts.

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think it’s in the administrative platform, all the laptops would be registered under the schools platform. If the admin disables the AI feature it disables search.

[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Could that be a reason to move away from googles platform then? When I was at school we didn't really have any platforms. Just windows PCs with a domain login and software we need installed on the PCs. We all had GIMP.

Head of IT was a twat, but the other IT teacher was based - gave everyone a memory stick with Linux on it.

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 4 points 13 hours ago

They are trying to force AI in schools. Schools are public businesses with funding. Companies don’t really care about end users unless it is selling advertising.

States are moving to stop AI in schools. If AI is blocked then the school is losing on its investment.

People should stop with Google the same as Meta.