this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
1333 points (99.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

12304 readers
2688 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree with the sentiment, but the deflock map also lists all automated highway tolls as ALPRs too. These aren’t flock based to my knowledge.

There may be “secret” flock installations. But there are also likely other brands and systems included in the 300k.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The nerd in this case being the OSM community

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OSM FTW!

EDIT: I do get accused of frequent, excessive, obscure use of initialisms.

Open Street Maps - Our Street Maps, not goog, not apple

[–] krakloskewm@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] krakloskewm@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago

I think it’s actually Open Street Maps. An alternative to to Google and Apple Maps

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 148 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The city I work at just ended their contract with them. Monday morning I get to send them a demand to remove them from our ROW within 30 days or we'll have them removed and fine them $500/camera per day until they pick them up and pay us our expenses related to the removal.

Our police are also bagging the cameras, including the solar panels (so they'll shut off).

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, they did still allow the cameras to begin with

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd take someone willing to learn from a mistake over someone who doubles down though

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're assuming they didn't just switch brands.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They did not.

City Council is made of of people who were misled by the "they only read license plates" bullshit. When they realized what they truly are, they decided not to renew the contract. Then a few days ago they took it a step further and decided to suspend it early along with their right-of-way permits.

[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Might be noteworthy if you missed it: https://lemmy.world/post/53011126

tl;dr: College told flock to remove the cameras and they refused saying they were within terms of the contract. Any cameras that got bagged were unbagged.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't go that far. It's an enclave for the mega-rich. I don't live there - literally every household is millionaires or better.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I drive 90 minutes to work. I'm on a city worker salary.

A good city-worker salary - hence the willingness to drive 90 minutes - but nowhere near enough to be a resident.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

My money is on Axon

[–] ElJefe@lemmy.ca 151 points 1 day ago

Woah woah, are you telling me that the surveillants don’t like being surveilled? I’m shocked, absolutely shocked I tell ya

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago

So is flock putting them up?

Angie Nixon mentioned this case in South Florida on a recent interview: https://archive.is/my13H

It really opens the door for any other third party to put up cameras and surveil without anyone noticing it.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 49 points 1 day ago

We NEED to Protect the Privacy of ~~American Citizens!~~ ~~Innocent People!~~ Corporations stealing BILLIONS of Taxpayer Dollars!

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

also so they can get a snapshot of all the IP addresses/people signed into google who tried searching the map. which...surprise...where's the map LOL

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

simply don't use google...

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My town uses the other brand, that might account for some of the difference

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Flock is not the only brand of ALPR (Automatic License Plate Reader). Its the brand/company that is receiving the most negative press, which means other companies providing the same service are quietly sneaking into towns and cities.

If you drive in an area covered by an ALPR-networked camera, your vehicle’s movements may already be in a searchable database. As the tools for building these systems become more widely available, the pressure for clearer rules about who may collect vehicle-location data, on whom, and for how long is unlikely to ea

As always keep reaching out to your local city council to ask where are these cameras being installed, how long is the information being retained, who is accessing these systems, and who is keeping the individuals accessing these systems accountable?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The one with all the product placement on The Rookie, Axon? They need to go fuck themselves too.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Product placement? More like just reality.

Axon is the maker of Taser, and like 90% of the body cams that departments use. ALPRs are simply the newest of many tools they offer, and adding Axon ALPRs to replace Glock is probably extremely easy since there is a 99.99% chance they already have Axon products, and an existing contract.

Axon is not new by any means.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

so has anyone figured out a reasonable way to block plates from being read?

an adhesive layer, a clear coat, a plastic cover with the right spectrum blocking?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago

The pretty common one is to have infrared LEDs shining on the plate. Humans can't see the light but cameras can and it blinds them. It's worth noting that it's illegal, and if the police catch you doing it they'll arrest you just for that. I'm not sure how much help that is, but then again, any technique that blocks the cameras from reading your plate is likely considered illegal.

[–] butter_tart@piefed.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know what? I really like Benn Jordan's YouTube videos. Not sure what made me think of that. Guess I just wanted to share that fact.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

also a fan.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that they don't just read the plates. They look at everything on the vehicle. Window stickers, license plate frames, cleanliness, scratches/dents, etc. Trying to disguise your plate will just make your vehicle more readily recognizable, and notify authorities that you have something to hide.

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Car wrap covered with SQL injections

[–] XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure there are laws that specifically say if you do something to prevent your plate from being read by these devices it's illegal. But it wouldn't matter anyway. They track you based on more than your plate. They even track pedestrians by looking at their clothing and such.

[–] TheDarkestShark@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Think thats scary look up gait recognition. I remember reading a book in middle school almost 20 years ago, in the book they used gait recognition because facial recognition was deemed to invasive and was made illegal. Probably based on real life but I never looked into the legality of it. The original Punisher show on Netflix also brought it up, its how the hacker dude finds Frank Castle and kicks off the shows plot.

[–] XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah but that's easier to fake just put a rock in your shoe

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

James Bond style license plate flipper.

Tho I'd prefer the unreasonable EMP gun to disable the cameras. Someone get Q in here.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot legally modify your license plate in any way, even if it leaves the number and stickers fully visible. I wonder if you couldn't do something to the area surrounding your license plate though to make the AI detection ignore your car/plates...

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Infrared lights around the plate doesn't modify it

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If the map isn't reporting any false information then they don't have a legal grounds for the removal and this likely violates anti-slap laws.

Flock is a private company with equal rights to everyone else: no more, no less.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Flock isn't the only entity operating security cameras and plate readers. How many non-Flock devices are being reported as Flock units?

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

At this point I think flock has become a common name for these types of devices

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a good question but given Flock's cooperation with the ICE I don't want to give them benefit of doubt. https://deflock.org/ isn't currently listing the supposed 300,000 nor does it claim they're all flock.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

“If they’re not doing anything wrong”

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

40% of the truth. Flock lies likes Facebook.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

We are living in a voyeur's dream world

load more comments
view more: next ›