this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

privacy

11354 readers
6 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Not my 20-year-old car.

Without regulation, this will continue, and get worse. Remember to vote in every election you can, both local, and national.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Democrats aren't campaigning on this stuff so I'm not sure how voting is going to help this particular issue. They don't seem to care about it much.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago

Like this: Vote GOP and they won't so much as listen to their constituency. Vote Dem and there's some possibility that calls, letters, etc will get them to do something that favors their constituency. Voting is the first step. Making yourself heard, and being an ongoing nuisance about it is the second step. And you better believe that the conservative constituents are doing both steps. Democracy IS a Verb, in fact it's a Gerund, it's an ongoing process.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

So, like 7-Up, then.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that? OnStar has been a thing since what? The 90s?

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not OEM, though. Those idiot consumers only have themselves to blame.

Maybe the OG versions, but GM put onstar in basically every vehicle they made by like the mid 2000s.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What does voting have to do with anything?

If you were paying attention about automobile privacy, you would known that democrats signed legislation into law in 2024 that requires all cars sold in the US to have driver monitoring software.

https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/nhtsa-finalizes-key-safety-rule-reduce-crashes-and-save-lives

https://www.gadgetreview.com/federal-surveillance-tech-becomes-mandatory-in-new-cars-by-2027

Partisan politics mean squat in the privacy sphere.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but voting was over in 2024. People just haven’t gotten the memo.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My car is doing no such thing, but it's a manual that's old enough to vote.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't worry. The surveillance cameras are making up for that gap in the data.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

rigs up ultrabright IR light arrays to Subaru

An arms race it is then!

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet, it likely has an FB account anyway. ☝🏼

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

Wild if true

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Big Tech companies think they have solved advertising with infinite data. According to them, privacy can go fuck itself.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The irony is, you can try and advertise but I stopped paying attention a long time ago. Besides, I'm too busy spending all my money on living, fuel, and food. Good Luck Have Fun. And my cars are all over 20 years old. GG

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

Countries are selling out their citizens to car companies in the name of "traffic safety"

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hoopty-ass shitmobile drivers unite!

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have a 2010 Mazda Pickup. It doesn't even share with me.

[–] BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago

Your B-Series is F to M trans (Ford to Mazda). We all know what's under that sexy hood.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

"Sharing" implies something much less predatory than the actual relationship.

Let me go bring a gun to a bank and see if they'd like to share any of their money with me.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I really hope the Slate truck is everything they say it will be. Its lack of spyware is a pretty compelling reason to buy one.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I looked it up now, slate truck. Seems like a good idea. I never cared for infotainment at all.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

I do, but only in the aspect of using Android auto/Apple carplay....

Anything else available from the infotainment system is usually just to facilitate that connection for me.

I already have everything on my phone, why do I also need it on my dash?

[–] molten@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sus that it's another bezos company

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 weeks ago

He's an investor, I'm not sure how big of a stake he has and I wish he didn't have one but I'm happy to have an option to not be surveilled by my own vehicle.

[–] radish6367@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same here. I wish Canada had a company making something similar since I’d rather not support the US economy. Choose your poison, I guess.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mexico is making something similar. But it has max speed of like 50

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That makes it pretty useless. Sometimes you need to go on highways or between cities. Is it 50 miles or 50 kilometers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

My biggest concern with it is Bezos' involvement.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

e-bikes. Bet they already do lol. So many people believe the "e" stands for "electric", but it actually stands for "enshitification"

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

I want to ride my bicycle, I want to ride my biiiiiiiiiiiiiike!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Had anyone published a guide on how to strip these sensors yet?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could just pull out the LTE/IoT module, and disconnect the service....

Whether that will have major down sides for the usability of the vehicle is the big question.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No, that won't work.

Instead it will just store all the data locally and then upload it once it gets the airgap broken when the mechanic plugs it in.

The only safe solution here is to remove the sensors that collect the data. But I haven't yet found aftermarket guides on how to do this with any major new car.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

YouTube for disabling on various models. Data removal is another issue

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e09Kjj2awG0

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thanks, but that guy doesn't sound like he knows what he was talking about.

He literally admitted that he had to get "information" from grok, and he never fact checked it.

There was no attempt to find or disable cameras, microphones, seat pressure sensors, etc. Those cars he "disabled" are probably still collecting all of the data and storing it locally. Just waiting for a dealer to plug it in to upload everything.

We really need just one person with car hacking skills to document how to disable the sensors (and then do a forensic analysis to confirm the data is no longer being collected). Then we'll all have at least one privacy car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

Indeed, how do we remove this too :(. Crazy how many hoops we have to jump on things we "own"

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes there's a YouTube video for various disable techniques via fuses or jumper wire kits. Such as this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e09Kjj2awG0

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks, but that guy doesn't sound like he knows what he was talking about.

He literally admitted that he had to get "information" from grok, and he never fact checked it.

There was no attempt to find or disable cameras, microphones, seat pressure sensors, etc. Those cars he "disabled" are probably still collecting all of the data and storing it locally. Just waiting for a dealer to plug it in to upload everything.

We really need just one person with car hacking skills to document how to disable the sensors (and then do a forensic analysis to confirm the data is no longer being collected). Then we'll all have at least one privacy car.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was an example, there are deeper dive videos also, and links to kits to buy that bypasses the units but tells the car things are still fine. Agreed we do nerd better hacking, but then Auto companies would sue

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right to repair prevents these sorts of law suits

But that's only for companies selling the hacking as a paid service. There is zero standing to sue a guy hacking his own car and providing the info for free on the Internet (or, eg, at defcon).

Only thing they can do is void your warranty

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They will claim decryption of proprietary code or something that violates Digital Rights Controls

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vendetta@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

We are all shocked

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This stuff is why I'm apprehensive of buying anything remotely new.

The problem is, I also don't want to burn prehistoric forests to travel.

So this sits in opposition to the fact that I want to travel around using the light from the sun as my primary energy source.

For those that can't read between the lines, I want an EV, that I can charge by solar.

I am also aware of the slate truck. I have thoughts on it, but it's worthy of consideration.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 0 points 2 weeks ago

What the fuck isn’t? Doesn’t even need to be connected to your WiFi. Devices can have cellular modems built into them now.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago

well yes, it's why I have a Chinese car, they don't share my data with my government who are the ones that may want to hurt me.

load more comments
view more: next ›