this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
125 points (79.3% liked)

interestingasfuck

10071 readers
1 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mok98@feddit.it 85 points 1 month ago

They are different species after all, another difference could be seen slicing them and putting them side by side, the pulp should have a different color too

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone who spends time in nature will tell you about varietals. You are being deliberately aggravating against readily accessible fruit. It's still fruit. It's still healthy. It's strange you would gatekeep berries.

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You are being deliberately aggravating against readily accessible fruit

🤺

[–] Lauchmelder@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

chill bro the post made no statement about which is better. you instantly value judged a picture of two heaps of berries

[–] starik@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

No! They are gatekeeping our blueberries and you are gaslighting us!

[–] kettuli@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or storebought blueberries and wild bilberries?

[–] matelt@feddit.uk 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm not a native speaker of English, and I've only recently learnt that the 'blueberries' I grew up foraging from the woods are in fact bilberries. Which is kind of interesting because although most people will call them blueberries, we have a regional name for them, 'brimbelles', that's kind of similar to bilberries when you squint your eyes.

[–] kettuli@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s the same in Finland, I was raised thinking that I was eating blueberries when they were, in fact, bilberries.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You did eat blueberries. In Scandinavian languages bilberries are called blueberries (blåbær, blåbär), because what Americans calls blueberries didn't exist there (the American sort was only introduced to Europe in the 1930s).

English isn't alone in deciding what is a blueberry and what isn't.

[–] matelt@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So really we should be calling those insipid, watery grape-sized 'blueberries' impostors. It ain't a blueberry if it doesn't stain your mouth purple!

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The wild North American blueberries (there are multiple species) are also small and flavorful. The giant, watery ones are a bred variety that you won't find in nature

[–] Ihmes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We're eating mustikka over here, which translates to bilberry in english. The "blueberries" are pensasmustikka in finnish.

[–] kettuli@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I stand corrected.

[–] emigu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] starik@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

How do u get burblebumbies?

[–] Beth@piefed.social 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can get both of these at my grocery store. Right next to each other. Sometimes the same brand, sometimes different. I grew up eating off the tree/large bush and found all different sizes on the same tree. Main difference is the flavor.

[–] Anon518@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Main difference is the flavor.

Can you elaborate?

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

One tastes like blueberry, unlike the other which tastes like blueberry.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

The bigger ones are sweet, sometimes too sweet, and don’t have a strong berry taste. They go good in like corn flakes or something when you need a healthy add-in. The smaller ones have a stronger flavor and can be too tart depending on if they are actually ripe. Sometimes they look ripe but if they are hard they are not ready to eat.

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

High bush vs low bush blueberries. They're so different they may as well be a separate berry.

[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

There’s also rabbiteye, which are similar to high bush but have lower cool hour requirements. Maybe it’s a subtype of high bush, but horticulturists around my area note a distinct difference in them.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you call them that because the bushes themselves look different?

[–] matti@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The wild sort grow in low shrubs up to maybe mid-shin whereas the one you bu from the garden centre is more of a bush

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they are like chest to face high, depending on your height.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks! TIL

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

*not shown - flavor is inverse to size.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not exactly true. Too small they're bitter, too big they're bland. There's a sweet spot in the middle.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

There's a sweet spot in the middle.

The pulp, yes

[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Odds are the ones on the left are Driscoll's genetic berries. Neat youtube documentary on Driscoll's monopoly on the berry market.

https://youtu.be/nyG-np0S0ZQ?is=0ZYjSFpAPixV7P8f

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just watched this the other day, good vid

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'll second this!

Great video, worth a watch.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Those are probably only different species, maturation levels or even size of the same species, cut the crap

Also, stop reposting :3

[–] SkaBunkel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

these are different species? Here we call the left ones American blue berries and the right ones would be our native ones, that are blue/purble inside; Americans would however call them bilberries.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

I had to explain this to a person I care much about once... Some balls are big and some are small, I just happen to have one of each. They're both delicious.

[–] Lopoloma@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There's no difference in health value per berry. Smaller berries gives you more bang for your buck.

[–] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Should also show the insides. Cut one of each in half.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Damn. Nature doesn't stand a chance!

♬I found my thrill
On Blueberry Hill ♬

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Bluebarries in many store-bought "blueberry" muffins: blue coloring with bits of minced grape skins for convincing texture.

[–] dumples@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago

The most interesting part is the wild ones are even better for you than the store bought. Much more concentrated nutrients in all wild foods.