this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

10669 readers
2 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dju@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

~~could~~ will

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Isn’t that the idea?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

{people susceptible to facebook scams} ∩ {people who use adblockers} = Ø

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, cool, I was accidentally correct! I think I pasted my ∅ off a swedish page.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, not quite correct. The character pasted off the Swedish page was Ø LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE (U+00D8).

It looks almost identical to the to the mathematical symbol for an empty set (at least in the font I'm using right now), but it doesn't mean anything even slightly similar and would be rendered entirely differently by, for example, a screen reader reading the text aloud.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Oh, yes, I can see the difference now. Thanks for filling me. My jokes about sets will now be 11% funnier.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Rain could lead to wet street

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Corporations must be held accountable for the scams that are posted/boosted on their platforms. If they profit off it, they must be liable for letting it go public.

I suspect a TV channel in any civilized place would avoid showing an advert for an obvious scam (the fake AI celebrity endorsement) because that would, at least, destroy their reputation, or even get sued for not vetting the content.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

in any civilized place

Got your answer right there

[–] normonator@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Malwarebytes sucks ass, but in this instance they aren't wrong.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

I've not used Facebook in years.

Best way to avoid the ads and scams feeding that corp.