this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

4280 readers
3 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice πŸ‰.


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I enjoyed the conceit in Messiah

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sleight of hand magician or Merlin magician?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

You decide 🌈

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

No, if he existed he was probably an apocalyptic prophet. Although his followers certainly were "magicians", as they created a mystery cult that endures to this day.

The mysteries included the sacraments that we still associate with Christianity: baptism and communion. These reenactments of various symbolic acts that the deity performed reflect the commitment of the adherent and grant them some kind of boonβ€” in this case everlasting life in heaven.

[–] Bismyth@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago

No, he was a freelance ritual specialist.

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I always had this pet theory that Jesus was more like a group of dudes who had a similar message and that the guy existed and was executed by romans (thats as far as we got from roman records iirc is a guy who fit the bill existed and was executed) but that the jesus stories from the new testament were an amalgamation of different street preachers or philosophers and were incorporated into religion

But my heart also wants to believe he was a dude who was really fuckin good at pulling coins from behind someones ear

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The clouding of historical vs mythological is interesting. I wonder if theres a bio of Jesus purely based off actual evidence and records that can be substantiated.

[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually stupidly chose Jesus as a historical figure to write a proper primary sources only paper thinking there would be a breadth of info on the guy... and found out the hard way that from a historically factual standpoint all we've got is he probably existed, was baptized, and was executed. Straight up all weve got is what roman records gave us and one painting.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

Substantiation is difficult because we're talking about a late Judaean prophet, but this piece explores Jesus in the context of Roman-occupied Judah, when there were many preachers predicting the end of the world and the salvation of the Jews; Jesus' movement outlasted his death.

Esoterica has an hour-long video on the historical Jesus, built on primary sources: link