this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
121 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

43130 readers
382 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's even more funny if you know the backstory of bun. It was basically the perfect example of how to not to do things before they burned a whole forrest to have Claude slop it into another language, based on a codebase that was measurably bad. Now nobody actually knows the whole codebase anymore.

Given the phenomenal garbage that are the other big vibecoded projects (like the "compiler that can compile Linux" - it can't) using bun now is just like lottery.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

What was wrong with bun before? I never used it just heard it had some great performance

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The code quality apparently was abysmal and full of dirty hacks due to a mix of "beginner energy" and "go fast & break things" Silicom Valley mindset. The issues with bun (leading to the big Anthropic hack) were subtly blamed on the Zig language, even though Zig is completely fine; Bun's code (which already was full of bad generated slop at that point, as well as code by programmers who were treated badly -> more bad code) was just crap.

After Zig was blamed the Zig creator wrote a blogpost detailing all of it. Worth a read, certainly more human than the corposlop Anthropic announces.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

andrew kelley is such a cool guy his attitude alone made me want to learn zig

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago

zig is cool

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago

I heard it had a lot of "just works" magic (and I've been burned many times on the cjs/mjs thing plus whatever the fuck deno is doing) so I get the appeal but also never used it.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 21 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think the unfortunate takeaway from this story is that rewriting a codebase of that size for under $200k using AI makes this endeavor suddenly feasible in a way that it previously wouldn’t have been. Some organizations have reason enough to spend a year rewriting with multiple engineers, but have no interest in a year-long feature freeze. But a 2-week feature freeze? The current money is starting to make sense and more orgs are going to start biting.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But also, that number is a lie. They haven't published any releases from that rewrite, it's still considered experimental, and they've spent weeks continuing to iterate upon it and certainly driving that number way higher. But they declared it done via blogpost to get that price-point and timeline in the headlines. Yet it still isn't shippable, and they're still burning cash and time on it

[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 1 points 3 hours ago

That’s good to know. I wasn’t aware of that