this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
118 points (100.0% liked)

196

19510 readers
449 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

According to the studies I've read, productivity increases when workers are mandated to stop work beyond eight hours a day; are mandated to take their fifteen minute breaks and their hour-long lunch break (and to actually eat a lunch); are mandated to leave work on Friday and take a weekend.

This was demonstrated to be effective even concerning workers who obsess on their job and voluntarily work through their breaks, or into the evening, or over the weekend. Breaks from work are good for everyone.

Productivity also increases when you switch to a four-day work-week (at eight hours a day).

Productivity also increases when you commute less, as we learned with telecommuting during the COVID-19 lockdown.

So why do bosses crunch? Why do they create a social climate that pressures workers to skip breaks? Why do they insist on more than the 40-hour work week? Why do they issue RTO mandates?

Pure vindictiveness. The ownership class resents that their workforce has needs and opinions, and wants them to suffer for it, even when a miserable crew reduces profits and dividends.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You've paid me for 40 hours and you'll receive 40 hours

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Minus bathroom breaks, Lemmy time, and other work-adjacent activities.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Now we're talking

[–] nightmare786@leminal.space -2 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

Why would you do anything more than what is in your contract?

Your employers also isn't going to pay you more than what is in there.

It isn't a privilage to be afforded basic human decency.

It isn't a privilage to be afforded basic human decency.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, mate. It's basic economics. You only get what you pay for.

[–] moshtradamus666@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, but there are people who simply aren't in the position to demand even such basic things. I think that's what they meant.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Then those people are slaves. I get your point, but that situation should not be accepted by anyone.