this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
1064 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86025 readers
3885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's such a hilariously dumb idea I hope the tech bros sink millions into it.

Lets make a data center we can't maintain, upgrade or access for any practical reason. Waiting for the suggestions to put them in geostationary orbits so that way their latency is even higher but going to struggle staying powered when in Earth's shadow. Or get put in the Earth-Sun L1 so they always have solar power but now have to have significant more radiators on top of even MORE latency beyond beyond the moon's orbit.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I’d rather we just seize the wealth they have stolen from the working people of the world and use it for something we actually need. Like healthcare, or reducing carbon emissions.

But futurism bro science idiots see all space adventurism as equal. They see billionaires wasting resources on ideas hashed out with an LLM during a ketamine bender as just as worthwhile and scientifically valid as a probe to deep space or a rover to Mars.

It makes sense if we have a space elevator and also invert the way most of the physics of data centers work.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

Space Nuttery is a mental illness.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The "good idea" isn't the data centers but the stock pumping. You propose something insanely difficult and expensive (also hopelessly impractical and stupid in this case) and because it is so difficult and expensive you claim you can monopolize the market if you succeed which is the ultimate dream of every capitalist but you just need some insane amount of investment to get there. Then when the money runs out you go back and ask for more and exploit sunk cost fallacy. All the while valuations increasing. It is an amazing way for already rich scammers to get much, much richer than could happen in a sane economy and slurp up huge amounts of capital that otherwise could have gone into more productive endeavors.

Obviously in any well regulated economic system this shit would be subject to some proper oversight to protect the interests of the majority, particularly all the people whose pensions and livelihoods are at risk when this all goes to shit.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

In our time, squeezing everyone for their worth is all there is left for these people to get rich. They've run out of ways to squeeze and so are going for the last hurrah.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

isnt thats what all the tech conferences are for, to hype the investors up. how long can they keep up with the peddling on those conferences? everytime a new con is our hub , its almost always a different usage of AI, so they need to come up with new "ideas" each time.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I had a conversation with a colleague of mine about this. He believed that Musk's decision to merge xAI and SpaceX was truly because of the potential of datacenters in space. I was unable to convince him that the logistics of this would be a nightmare and that this was just a way to make the Twitter buyout SpaceX's problem.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

People that deal in computers think reality works like computers: just upgrade your drivers and download the reality you want.

[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago

It's the Elon's believe actually.

[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

There recently was a report on Channel 4 about an American Bitcoin psycho gathering in Vegas where people framed the tech as unter interplanetary payment system. Someone explain them bandwidth please.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just billionaire psychosis like where ai got to where it is to begin with. Obviously they’re all visionaries leading the world to a better place…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I skimmed the title for a sec and thought "what's wrong with orbital stations?" before realizing the utter stupidity that graced my vision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If and only if someone is insane enough to develop off-planet manufacturing with the bulk of the raw materials originating from somewhere in deep space, e.g. asteroid mining, putting data centers in space might be useful for problems that demand intensive compute and can work with extreme latency.

Then again that's like saying inventing the airplane would have been a good strategy for Neanderthals to find better firewood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine launching that scale of infrastructure, loaded full of Nvidia chips that'll be outdated in like 2 years.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 20 hours ago

And then it gets wiped out by one of his own satellites smashing through it at 25,000mph.

load more comments
view more: next ›