this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
565 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85659 readers
3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago

This happens on Linux via Edge Suite.

They block my ability to use quite a few websites. I’ve tried changing my user agent amongst many other solutions but it never works. My IP is not blacklisted.

I GUESS YOU DIDNT WANT ME TO BUY ANYTHING ON YOUR GODDAMN SITE ANYWAY.

[–] ziproot@lemmy.ml 110 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is a national security issue. A major corporation should not be able effectively impose a security ceiling by banning more secure operating systems (like GrapheneOS) due to it not making them money. Governments should pass regulations requiring any devices that meet certain security standards and support hardware attestation to be accepted by hardware attestation schemes. This will not pose an undue burden on businesses because you can easily add something like GrapheneOS to your scheme (https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide), and even if it did, that doesn’t matter when national security is on the line.

Right now, it’s not as dire because you can still choose image or audio CAPTCHA, but I don’t know how long that will last, and getting the regulation out before the problem happens is better than after.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

The whole "regulation is bad" scheme was bought and paid for with billions of dollars spent a small number of people who could make tens of billions by conducting their business without concern for the damage (economic externalities) they do. Its a transparent history and obvious on its face.

And yet so many average people go online and parrot it back, drinking the coolaid and passing it along.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago

getting the regulation out before the problem happens is better than after

There's this weird effect where preventing a disaster is often invisible, sometimes looks detrimental or a waste of time; but responding to a problem and solving it is visible and will get you acclaim. That creates a cynical incentive to let a problem become visible before combating it so as to avoid the Kassandra effect where nobody believes you until it happens.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 7 points 2 days ago

This look le ke illégal, I guess they will shutdown internet for a big par of the population. And they I'll discover than internet traffic is less than 10% human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Monopoly or Duopoly. Either way, it's gotta be taken down.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It cannot be taken down unless there are many changes in several countries; however it will be quite the achievement to reform or have revolution in only one or two countries in the next generation.

The only hope in all this is that technology changes, and what Google has control over will be obsolete in a decade or more.

Cold comfort.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Need another Roosevelt to come along and take an anti-monopoly hammer to these big companies and shatter them into pieces

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 132 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Maybe this is the kick up the arse companies need to finally start using hCaptcha or even Anubis.

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I hope so, but it could easily come the other way. "We are so used to/deeply integrated/in a close strategic partnership with Google therefore we rather lose 5 % of our customers that care about privacy and are a pain in the ass for our data-driven business."

[–] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

5% is huuuge overestimate. Maybe on a tech site or forum. On a regular website for the general public? Less than a rounding error. Remember, we are in a lemmy bubble

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago

I know, it was largely exaggerated, but a smaller percentage makes the negative scenario drastically more realistic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We've moved to Cloudflare's turnstile and it's significantly less obnoxious.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless you use a VPN and run any kind of script blocker like noscript or uBlock Origin's medium or hard modes.

So fucking obnoxious.

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Yup. I've had to add exceptions to my VPN for this reason. Mainly food/grocery delivery sites for some reason

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 87 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I personally have definitely encountered the point where I'm just not going to do some things merely because of "the principle".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I like that, and feel similarly.

Like, great, you add that 'feature' to your product. I'm just not going to use it anymore.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago

I don't even care about the inconvenience of doing everything myself, it just feels wrong to not be in control

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I've started the transition away from Google. Sucks because, sometimes, it was really convenient. But now, screw 'em.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Convenience is how they get you. I have also been telling people for years that security and convenience are opposite ends of the same line. The closer you are to one the farther you are from the other.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

~~Security~~ Privacy. They are distinct concepts.

For example, tokenised and biometrically authenticated transactions are more secure and more convenient than cash payments which are comparatively riskier, easier to forge, easier to steal etc.

However, this allows banks and payment providers to keep tabs on your transaction data, which cash does not.

Convenience and privacy are usually at opposite ends, security can come at either end depending on the medium.

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cash is only "less convenient" for the banks and businesses that would prefer to track you. A cashless society is a society fully stripped of privacy, a society where poor people are guaranteed to stay poor, and where only the rich can afford privacy and security.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's my point.

Regularly going to ATMs / banks is demonstrably less convenient for both consumers and businesses and safeguarding the cash presents a security risk, especially for small businesses.

But the alternative of digital payments comes at a huge cost to privacy.

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I wasn't contradicting you, I was agreeing with you.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Biometrics are not more secure, because you can be forced to give it against your will.

Fingerprint? They can force your finger onto the scanner.

Eye scan/Face Scan? They can put you in a headlock and hold the phone infront of you.

You cant be manhandled into typing a password.

Biometic security is convenience, not security.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Quick question: If Google doesn't want to own Android anymore, why don't they make it public domain instead of trying everything to kill it?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want Android very much and all the data that goes with it.

They don’t want you to use Android in a way that doesn't let them harvest your data.

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

This. It’s shocking how many people in tech circles still see Google as anything other than a data harvester for ads.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Because they'd rather own the public

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

What makes you think they want to kill it? I think they regret choosing GPL software to base it on, and dgaf about the small segment of people who use forks, except to worry that one of them might take off with an OEM and regular people.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Recaptcha has been trash for years now. Like, it either doesn't bock bots, or it blocks actual real people. Don't use it. Use turnstile.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

turnstile

Haven't heard of it before, looks to be made by Cloudflare. Cloudflare don't seem to be a totally awful company, but that's always just one CEO-change away.

Their web site sounds promising, saying "Turnstile can generate multiple types of non-intrusive challenges to verify users are human, all without showing visitors a puzzle." and "Unlike CAPTCHA options, Turnstile never harvests data for ad retargeting."

So how do they make money from this?

[–] ne0phyte@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

It's right on the page you linked? You have to pay for it.

Free tier says it's cloudflare branded and only recommended for small hobby projects.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

People are so oblivious to this shit.

... OK, no, there's a slow dawning that online privacy is important for many reasons, but it never seems to translate into action. Probably largely because there's hardly any consumer alternatives. Employers have been renewing contracts with Big Tech for decades and can't be arsed to even think about changing their behavior.

They're still going to buy new surveillophones just to be able to log in again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Everyone needs to flood the web with fake reCAPTCHA QR codes that lead to something that looks malicious to the average person.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago

LOOKS malicious? Why not just BE malicious? That's way more lucrative if we're at that point.

Looking malicious just trains users that it's probably ok to do X on sketchy sites...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

The robots were about to kill me and my entire family when I said "Look! A stop sign!". They immediately recognized my superior intelligence and retreated. /s

It's funny because my town just posted an article saying a bunch of people got scammed by fake ones already.

[–] rob200@retrofed.com 5 points 2 days ago

Is the recaptcha on Google search engine, apps, android os more than one? or is it strictly 3rd party websites?

load more comments
view more: next ›