this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
227 points (97.1% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The suit says the fight is “private” and “for-profit,” and it alleges that even though the UFC claims it is “eating” the cost of the event and isn’t selling tickets, “the event will likely be profitable for the UFC and its partners.”

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You think so? Do you think having the president endorse your company and stage an event on the whitehouse lawn could possibly financially benefit the UFC??

[–] 73rdnemesio@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago

Just remember. He loves Tesler

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This timeline is sooooo dumb.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imagine in the before times If you wrote a fiction where the president was a McDonald's devouring fat piece of shit pedo-rapist that was staging a UFC fight on the whitehouse lawn.

[–] kewjo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

back to the future got it pretty right

[–] QuincyPeck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I mean, Biff was based on Trump. He’s always been what he is.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They did it with Canadian Bacon they just didn't make the president enough of a selfish moron.

https://youtu.be/_nk2ZNKOxCY

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Only way Idiocracy could be more accurate is if they picked a white man instead of terry crews as president.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

do you have a different source than CBS News?

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the filing itself that CBS are reporting on. I mean I understand not trusting a source but mainstream news reporting on a matter of public record....?

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

CBS news is a far right propaganda outlet now, so it's about not giving them traffic. There are plenty of reputable sources reporting on this story, there's no reason to link to them.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because they brought in Bari Weiss to clamp down on truthful reporting or because they fired Stephen Colbert for speaking truth to power or because they fired Scott Pelley of 60 minutes for telling the truth?

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This whole ufc fight at the Whitehouse is as American as it gets. Like it's a perfect representation of American culture. The only thing that could be added to the scene to make it more cringe is tax paying netflix watching rebel protestors at the fences.

Everyone bites the hand feeding them instead of cooking for themselves. Shit detach and cut the hand off already.

[–] 51dusty@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, it's a caricature of America the through the lens of a potentially demented and definitely criminal narcissist.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, but we still all pay for it to be this way! I think that was the point I was trying to get across in my first comment. 🫠

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

the system is what it does. as in this is america not a caricature at all.

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Getting some Stargate vibes from that arch…